Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Studying Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling by Aortic Debanding in Rodents
Published on: July 14, 2021
The Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Children
Anoop K Singh1, Ross M Ungerleider2, Yuk M Law3
1Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, MS-713, 9000 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. asingh@chw.org.
Insights
Pediatric aortic valve repair (AVR) leads to significant reverse remodeling, improving ventricular size and mass. Pre-operative left ventricular dilatation may predict persistent dysfunction, highlighting the need for objective assessments in children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Limited data exist on optimal timing for pediatric aortic valve repair (AVR).
- Assessing midterm outcomes and predictors of poor results after AVR in children is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the midterm response to aortic valve repair (AVR) in pediatric patients.
- To identify predictors of poor outcomes following AVR in children.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 41 pediatric patients undergoing AVR between 2001 and 2006 with >3 months follow-up.
- Collection of pre-, peri-, and post-operative data, including demographics and symptoms.
- Echocardiographic parameters (ventricular dimensions, mass) were measured and indexed to body surface area (z-score) pre-operatively and at follow-up.
Main Results:
- Significant reduction in indexed left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (z-score +1.3 to -0.1, p<0.001) and indexed left ventricular mass (z-score +3.9 to +0.5, p<0.001) post-AVR.
- No significant correlation found between pre-operative symptoms and post-operative left ventricular (LV) dilatation, hypertrophy, or dysfunction.
- Pre-operative LV dilatation (LVEDD, LVESD) correlated with persistent LV dysfunction at follow-up in a subset of patients (7/41).
Conclusions:
- Pediatric patients show significant reverse remodeling after aortic valve repair (AVR).
- Pre-operative left ventricular dilatation is a potential predictor of persistent LV dysfunction post-AVR.
- Clinical symptoms are less reliable indicators in children; objective functional assessments are needed.
Abstract:
There are scant data in pediatrics on the optimal timing for aortic valve repair (AVR). This study assesses the midterm response to AVR and possible predictors of poor outcome. From 2001 to 2006, 41 patients had greater than 3-month follow-up after AVR for aortic insufficiency, aortic stenosis, or both. Pre-, peri-, and post-operative data were collected, including demographics and clinical symptoms. Two reviewers measured echocardiographic parameters from the pre-operative and latest follow-up echocardiograms. Ventricular dimensions were indexed to body surface area (z-score). Median age at AVR was 13 years with 83 % having a Ross operation. The average left ventricular end-diastolic dimension pre-op, z-score of +1.3, significantly decreased at last follow-up to a mean z-score of -0.1 (p < 0.001). Similarly the indexed LV mass decreased from +3.9 to +0.5 (p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between the presence of pre-op symptoms and the presence of post-op LV dilatation, hypertrophy, or dysfunction. In the subset of patients (7/41) with persistent LV dysfunction at last follow-up, there was a significant correlation with pre-op LV dilatation as assessed by both LVEDD (p = 0.02) and LVESD (p = 0.05). Children demonstrate significant reverse remodeling after AVR. Pre-op LV dilatation may predict patients with persistent LV dysfunction post-AVR. Symptoms are less useful in children, suggesting the need for more objective data for functional assessment.
More Related Videos
05:18Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in Juvenile Landrace Swine: A LVAD Implantation Model of Pediatric Heart Failure
Published on: January 16, 2026
11:20A Rodent Model of The Ross Operation: Syngeneic Pulmonary Artery Graft Implantation in A Systemic Position
Published on: April 1, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests