Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Conformity01:20

Conformity

48.3K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
48.3K
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

3.2K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
3.2K
Dynamic Equilibrium02:20

Dynamic Equilibrium

66.3K
A reversible chemical reaction represents a chemical process that proceeds in both forward (left to right) and reverse (right to left) directions. When the rates of the forward and reverse reactions are equal, the concentrations of the reactant and product species remain constant over time and the system is at equilibrium. A special double arrow is used to emphasize the reversible nature of the reaction. The relative concentrations of reactants and products in equilibrium systems vary greatly;...
66.3K
Distributed Loads: Problem Solving01:21

Distributed Loads: Problem Solving

1.2K
Beams are structural elements commonly employed in engineering applications requiring different load-carrying capacities. The first step in analyzing a beam under a distributed load is to simplify the problem by dividing the load into smaller regions, which allows one to consider each region separately and calculate the magnitude of the equivalent resultant load acting on each portion of the beam. The magnitude of the equivalent resultant load for each region can be determined by calculating...
1.2K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

39.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.3K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

402
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
402

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insights on structure and influence from the adjacency and Laplacian eigenspectra of intersecting ring networks.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Motor organisation of social play in children with autism.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2025
Same author

Multi-Modal Convolutional Parameterisation Network for Guided Image Inverse Problems.

Journal of imaging·2024
Same author

The intrinsic cybernetics of large complex systems and how droughts turn into floods.

The Science of the total environment·2022
Same author

Identification of effective spreaders in contact networks using dynamical influence.

Applied network science·2021
Same author

Eigenvector alignment: Assessing functional network changes in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

PloS one·2020
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.7K

Using Network Dynamical Influence to Drive Consensus.

Giuliano Punzo1,2, George F Young3, Malcolm Macdonald1

  • 1Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Advanced Space Concept Laboratory, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Scientific Reports
|May 24, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces dynamical influence for ranking network nodes by their impact on system evolution. It reveals an optimized method for steering network states, applicable to directed graphs and complex systems.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.7K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Network Science
  • Complex Systems Theory
  • Dynamical Systems

Background:

  • Network analysis often focuses on node importance for information routing.
  • Existing methods for network control may not be universally applicable or optimized.
  • Understanding node influence is crucial for network dynamics and state transitions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and analyze the concept of 'dynamical influence' for ranking network nodes.
  • To demonstrate how dynamical influence optimizes effort distribution for steering network states.
  • To extend network analysis to directed graphs, offering a more general framework.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the 'dynamical influence' metric for node ranking.
  • Theoretical analysis of network steering using dynamical influence.
  • Application to a model system of self-propelled agents with network interactions.

Main Results:

  • Dynamical influence effectively ranks nodes based on their ability to influence system dynamics.
  • This metric provides an optimized distribution of effort for transitioning networks between states.
  • The framework is demonstrated on directed graphs, enhancing generality.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamical influence offers a novel approach to understanding and controlling network behavior.
  • The findings have implications for biological systems (flocks, swarms) and technological network design.
  • This theoretical framework provides a foundation for future research in network control and optimization.