Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: Use of digital human modeling for promoting health, care and well-being.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Proprioception and vision relationship in aimed movement with restricted and reversed vision.

Applied ergonomics·2025
Same author

Transient pain and discomfort when wearing high-heeled shoes.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

A Machine Learning Model for Week-Ahead Hypoglycemia Prediction From Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2024
Same author

What Aimed Movement Models Fit Distal Pointing With Varying Depth?

Human factors·2024
Same author

Determinants of self-efficacy of driving behavior among young adults in the UAE: Impact of gender, culture, and varying environmental conditions in a simulated environment.

Heliyon·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 20, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K

Pointing Device Performance in Steering Tasks.

Ransalu Senanayake1, Ravindra S Goonetilleke2

  • 1Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|May 25, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Touch screens offer varying efficiency compared to mice for graphical user interfaces. Optimal device choice depends on task difficulty, balancing performance and user comfort for effective human-computer interaction.

Keywords:
Fitts’ lawcontrol-display ratioindex of difficultymovement timepointing devicesteering law

More Related Videos

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
15:00

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

4.1K
Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults
06:12

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults

Published on: February 12, 2020

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 20, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K
The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
15:00

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

4.1K
Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults
06:12

Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults

Published on: February 12, 2020

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Usability Engineering
  • Interaction Design

Background:

  • The proliferation of touch-screen devices necessitates understanding their performance relative to traditional pointing devices.
  • Evaluating touch screen interaction efficacy is crucial for optimizing graphical user interfaces (GUIs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the maneuvering efficacy of touch screens against other pointing devices.
  • To determine optimal settings for touch screen interaction based on task demands and user preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated movement time, accuracy, and user preferences across four pointing device settings with 14 participants.
  • Assessed performance in both ballistic and visual control tasks, considering different steering difficulties.

Main Results:

  • Optimal touch screen settings varied based on task difficulty, differentiating between ballistic and visual control.
  • Resting the arm on a touch screen increased movement time for steering tasks.
  • The choice between a mouse and touch screen depends on steering difficulty when considering performance and comfort.

Conclusions:

  • Input device selection for human-computer interaction should be application-specific.
  • Optimizing pointing devices to match GUI requirements is essential for effective interaction.
  • Task difficulty significantly influences the comparative performance of touch screens versus mice.