Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015
Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study
Daniel A Godefrooij1, Kim Boom2, Nienke Soeters2
1Utrecht Cornea Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Office E03.136, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. d.a.godefrooij@umcutrecht.nl.
Corneal crosslinking (CXL) effectiveness for keratoconus is predicted by baseline visual acuity and corneal shape. Patients with poorer initial vision and more central cones show better outcomes after CXL treatment.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Surgery
- Vision Science
Background:
- Keratoconus is a progressive corneal disease.
- Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is a standard treatment for keratoconus.
- Predictors for CXL effectiveness are crucial for patient selection and outcome prediction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate previously identified predictors of corneal crosslinking (CXL) effectiveness.
- To assess the predictive value of baseline corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (Kmax) in a new cohort.
- To determine if these predictors can guide customized CXL treatment.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study validating previous findings.
- Inclusion of 112 eyes from 90 consecutive keratoconus patients treated with epithelium-off CXL.
- Analysis of CDVA and Kmax changes from baseline to 1-year post-treatment using univariable and multivariable analyses.
Main Results:
- Lower pretreatment CDVA independently predicted CDVA improvement 1 year post-CXL (β = -0.476, P < 0.01).
- Eyes with preoperative central cones were more likely to experience Kmax flattening (β = 0.655, P < 0.01).
- Results showed high reproducibility compared to the initial cohort, though the CDVA prediction model had limited predictive value (R² = 0.15).
Conclusions:
- Patients with lower baseline visual acuity are more likely to achieve visual acuity gains after CXL.
- Patients with more pronounced central corneal cones benefit more from CXL in terms of keratometry flattening.
- These findings support the use of baseline CDVA and Kmax to personalize CXL treatment strategies for keratoconus.
More Related Videos
09:03Murine Corneal Transplantation: A Model to Study the Most Common Form of Solid Organ Transplantation
Published on: November 17, 2014
04:00Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment