Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid
Published on: December 2, 2022
Correlation between bond strength and nanomechanical properties of adhesive interface
Pedro Henrique Freitas1,2, Marcelo Giannini3, Rodrigo França4
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Dental Materials, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Av. Limeira, 901 Areião P.O. Box 52, Piracicaba, SP, 13414-903, Brazil. freitasph@globo.com.
Objectives:
The aims of this study were to evaluate the nanohardness and Young's modulus of the adhesive-dentin interface and to correlate them with the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) after storage in water for 24 h and 6 months.
Methods:
Eighty human third molar teeth were bonded to composite resin with the Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose (SBMP), Adper Single Bond 2 (SB2), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) or Clearfil S3 Bond (CS3) adhesive systems and stored in water for 24 h and 6 months. Three bonded teeth were selected for each group for nanoindentation methodology to obtain the nanohardness and modulus values (n = 3), while seven bonded teeth each group were used for μTBS (n = 7). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Spearman correlation between nanohardness and modulus and μTBS values was also calculated.
Results:
Nanohardness and Young's modulus values for the dentin and hybrid layer were not significantly different regardless of the adhesive system or water storage periods (p > 0.05). Nanohardness and Young's modulus values for the adhesive layer were significantly higher for SB2 than for SBMP, CSE, and CS3 systems in both water storage periods. The μTBS values for SBMP and CSE were significantly higher than for SB2 and CS3 in both storage periods. An inverse correlation between Young's modulus and μTBS was observed for the adhesive layer.
Conclusion:
The water storage periods did not alter nanohardness, Young's modulus, and μTBS of adhesives. The adhesive layer of SB2 showed the highest nanohardness and Young's modulus, but the highest dentin bond strength was obtained with SBMP and CSE. Thus, a lower Young's modulus yielded high bond strength.
Clinical Relevance:
The inverse correlation between the Young's modulus of adhesive systems and dentin bond strength suggests adequate resistance of the adhesive to elastic deformation under stress, which are important properties to predict the success of the dental restoration.
Related Concept Videos
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Chemical Bonds
Atoms participate in a chemical bond formation to acquire a completed valence-shell electron configuration similar to that of the noble gas nearest to it in atomic number. Ionic, covalent, and metallic bonds are some of the important types of chemical bonds. Bond energy and bond length determine the strength of a chemical bond.
Types of Chemical Bonds
An ionic bond is formed due to electrostatic attraction between cations and anions. Often, the ions are formed by the transfer of electrons...
Valence Bond Theory
Bond Energies and Bond Lengths
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Intermolecular Forces and Physical Properties

