Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026
Gasless Endoscopic Thyroidectomy via the Trans-Axillary Approach
Published on: September 15, 2023
Comparison between Focus Harmonic scalpel and other hemostatic techniques in open thyroidectomy: A systematic review
Matteo Angelo Cannizzaro1, Laura Borzì2, Salvatore Lo Bianco3
1Department of "Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e tecnologie Avanzate - G. F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Endocrine Surgery Unit, "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele" Hospital, Catania, Italy. cannizzaromatteoangelo@yahoo.it.
Background:
The purpose of this review was to compare the efficacy and surgical outcomes of total thyroidectomy between the Focus Harmonic scalpel (Ethicon, Cincinnati, OH) and other hemostatic procedures.
Methods:
An extensive search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases from January 2008 to October 2014. Operating time, blood loss, pain, complications, and hospital stay were evaluated.
Results:
When compared with conventional techniques or LigaSure Precise Vessel Sealing System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), the use of the Focus Harmonic scalpel reduced operative time by 22,428 minutes and blood loss by 13,914 mL. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Focus Harmonic scalpel group with a mean reduction of 0.410 days.
Conclusion:
According to our meta-analysis, when comparing the Focus Harmonic scalpel versus conventional techniques, it seems evident that the use of this device in thyroid surgery is associated with a mean reduction in operating time, blood loss, and hospital stay, without any increase in pain and complications. There was no appreciable difference between the Focus Harmonic scalpel and the LigaSure Precise Vessel Sealing System. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: First-1578, 2016.
