Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing standards in animal research review.

R Dresser1

  • 1School of Law, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
|May 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) generally agreed on refining protocols to reduce animal pain and distress. However, they struggled with assessing the scientific justification for animal use in research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research subjects' voices: the missing element in research ethics.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2015
Same author

Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.

Clinical genetics·2015
Same author

A MODIFIED METHOD OF OBTAINING LARGE AMOUNTS OF RICKETTSIA PROWAZEKI BY ROENTGEN IRRADIATION OF RATS.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2009
Same author

Weighing the benefits of new Alzheimer's treatments.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2007
Same author

Dementia research: ethics and policy for the twenty-first century.

Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966)·2004
Same author

Procreation and punishment.

The Hastings Center report·2003

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory animal science
  • Animal research ethics
  • Regulatory compliance

Background:

  • Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) are essential for overseeing animal research.
  • Evaluating the necessity and ethical implications of animal use is a critical component of IACUC reviews.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the consistency and challenges faced by IACUCs in reviewing hypothetical animal research protocols.
  • To identify emerging standards in animal welfare and areas of consensus or disagreement among committees.

Main Methods:

  • Review of four hypothetical animal research protocols by 32 different IACUCs.
  • Analysis of committee feedback, modifications requested, and approval status.

Main Results:

Keywords:
Animal Welfare ActBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchEmpirical ApproachPublic Health Service

Related Experiment Videos

  • Strong consensus among IACUCs on the need to modify protocols to minimize animal pain and distress.
  • Significant disagreement and difficulty observed in IACUCs' assessment of the scientific justification for animal use.
  • Emerging standards were identified for specific procedures like antibody production, induced disease models, surgery, restraint, and behavioral conditioning.

Conclusions:

  • IACUCs demonstrate a general agreement on refining protocols for animal welfare.
  • Assessing the justification for animal use remains a significant challenge for IACUCs, indicating a need for clearer guidelines and training.