Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h
Ole N Mathiassen1, Henrik Vase, Jesper N Bech
1aDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby bUniversity Clinic in Nephrology and Hypertension, Holstebro Hospital, Hospital Jutland West, Holstebro cDepartment of Nephrology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby dDepartment of Cardiology, Viborg Hospital, Viborg eDepartment of Cardiology, Randers Hospital, Randers fDepartment of Endocrinology, Aarhus University Hospital, NBG, Skejby gDepartment of Internal Medicine, Silkeborg Hospital, Silkeborg hDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Background:
Renal denervation (RDN), treating resistant hypertension, has, in open trial design, been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) dramatically, but this was primarily with respect to office BP.
Method:
We conducted a SHAM-controlled, double-blind, randomized, single-center trial to establish efficacy data based on 24-h ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM). Inclusion criteria were daytime systolic ABPM at least 145 mmHg following 1 month of stable medication and 2 weeks of compliance registration. All RDN procedures were carried out by an experienced operator using the unipolar Medtronic Flex catheter (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California, USA).
Results:
We randomized 69 patients with treatment-resistant hypertension to RDN (n = 36) or SHAM (n = 33). Groups were well balanced at baseline. Mean baseline daytime systolic ABPM was 159 ± 12 mmHg (RDN) and 159 ± 14 mmHg (SHAM). Groups had similar reductions in daytime systolic ABPM compared with baseline at 3 months [-6.2 ± 18.8 mmHg (RDN) vs. -6.0 ± 13.5 mmHg (SHAM)] and at 6 months [-6.1 ± 18.9 mmHg (RDN) vs. -4.3 ± 15.1 mmHg (SHAM)]. Mean usage of antihypertensive medication (daily defined doses) at 3 months was equal [6.8 ± 2.7 (RDN) vs. 7.0 ± 2.5 (SHAM)].RDN performed at a single center and by a high-volume operator reduced ABPM to the same level as SHAM treatment and thus confirms the result of the HTN3 trial.
Conclusion:
Further, clinical use of RDN for treatment of resistant hypertension should await positive results from double-blinded, SHAM-controlled trials with multipolar ablation catheters or novel denervation techniques.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Vasodilators

