Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Laminotomy for Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion Access and Injection in Swine
Published on: October 10, 2017
Digital Subtraction Angiography Use During Epidural Steroid Injections Does Not Reliably Distinguish Artery from Vein
Ameet S Nagpal, George C Chang-Chien, Jonathan A Benfield1
1Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio.
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) does not reliably predict arterial spread during epidural steroid injections (ESIs). Current evidence suggests DSA offers no proven safety benefits and increases radiation exposure for patients and practitioners.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Pain Management
- Medical Imaging Techniques
- Neurology
Background:
- Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are common pain management procedures, with transforaminal approaches carrying risks of severe complications.
- Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is a fluoroscopic technique proposed to detect arterial needle placement during ESIs, aiming to prevent adverse events.
- Catastrophic complications from ESIs are often linked to inadvertent arterial injection of steroids or local anesthetics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the scientific literature and determine if digital subtraction angiography (DSA) can differentiate between arterial and venous uptake during epidural injections.
- To assess the efficacy of DSA as a safety measure in interventional pain management.
Main Methods:
- A narrative review of existing scientific pain literature was conducted.
- A PubMed search utilized keywords including 'digital subtraction angiography,' 'epidural,' 'fluoroscopy,' 'intravascular injection,' 'paraplegia,' and 'quadriplegia.'
- Studies were screened according to PRISMA guidelines, with 10 articles selected for review based on inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Main Results:
- While studies suggest DSA can detect vascular spread, none conclusively demonstrated its ability to specifically identify arterial spread.
- The reviewed literature did not provide significant evidence of DSA's capability to predict or prevent arterial injection during ESIs.
- The potential benefit of detecting arterial contrast spread during fluoroscopy remains theoretical, as specific arterial detection by DSA is not well-reported.
Conclusions:
- Current scientific evidence does not support the use of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for predicting arterial spread during epidural steroid injections.
- DSA exposes patients and practitioners to increased radiation levels without demonstrable improvements in safety parameters.
- Further research is needed to evaluate alternative or improved methods for ensuring safety during transforaminal epidural injections.
More Related Videos
05:18Author Spotlight: Ultrasound-Guided Needle Release Combined with Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Supinator Syndrome
Published on: May 26, 2023
03:14Author Spotlight: Enhancing Success of Ultrasound-Guided Neuraxial Anesthesia in Cases with Difficult Anatomy
Published on: January 31, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...