Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reliability theory and clinical psychology.

R W Payne

    Journal of Clinical Psychology
    |March 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary

    Psychologists often overlook test reliability, misusing the standard error of measurement. This study corrects common misconceptions about estimating true scores and their associated error ranges in psychological testing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Personality predicts individual responsiveness to the risks of starvation and predation.

    Proceedings. Biological sciences·2011
    Same author

    Analysis of the relationships between environmental factors (aeroallergens, air pollution, and weather) and asthma emergency admissions to a hospital in Mexico City.

    Allergy·1998
    Same author

    Predicting wheat yields: the search for valid and precise models.

    Ciba Foundation symposium·1997
    Same author

    Bilateral ossifying fibroma of the maxillary sinus.

    Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology·1989
    Same author

    Quality of oral anticoagulant therapy.

    Clinical and laboratory haematology·1985
    Same author

    Demonstration of carcinoembryonic antigen in bone marrow from patients with carcinoma.

    Journal of clinical pathology·1984

    Area of Science:

    • Psychometrics
    • Psychological Assessment
    • Measurement Theory

    Background:

    • Psychologists frequently disregard test reliability data when reporting results.
    • Current practices rely on the standard error of measurement (SEM) to estimate true score ranges.
    • Common assumptions about observed scores and SEM in psychometric textbooks are widely accepted but potentially flawed.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To challenge and correct prevalent misconceptions regarding the estimation of true scores and measurement error in psychological testing.
    • To present a scientifically accurate method for determining the most probable true score and its associated error range.
    • To discuss the implications of these findings for psychological report writing and interpretation.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical analysis of established psychometric principles concerning reliability and standard error of measurement.
    • Development and description of a revised procedure for estimating true scores and error bounds.
    • Examination of the theoretical underpinnings of common psychometric assumptions.

    Main Results:

    • The study demonstrates that popular beliefs about observed scores as the best estimate of true scores are incorrect.
    • It is shown that the standard error of measurement is not the standard deviation of true scores around the observed score.
    • A correct procedure for estimating the most probable true score and its error range is detailed.

    Conclusions:

    • Current methods for estimating true scores and measurement error in psychological testing are fundamentally flawed.
    • Revised procedures are necessary for accurate reporting of psychological test results.
    • Adoption of corrected methods will enhance the precision and validity of psychological assessments.

    Related Experiment Videos