Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2026

Deep Vein Thrombosis Induced by Stasis in Mice Monitored by High Frequency Ultrasonography
Published on: April 13, 2018
A review of the venous thrombotic issues associated with multiple myeloma
Despina Fotiou1, Grigoris Gerotziafas2,3, Efstathios Kastritis1
1a Department of Clinical Therapeutics , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine , Athens , Greece.
Introduction:
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications. The first reports of high VTE rates date back to 1999 but became more apparent with the introduction of novel agents in the treatment of MM and mostly with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs; thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide).
Areas Covered:
Currently thromboprophylaxis is recommended for patients who receive IMiDs-based regimens and the type of thrombophrophylaxis is based on patient-, disease- and treatment-related risk factors. Making the distinction between the intrinsic risk of thrombosis in MM and the effect of therapy is crucial. The use of aspirin, low molecular weight heparins and warfarin are the recommended drugs but despite their appropriate use the rates of VTE are not completely eliminated. Expert commentary: Research into biomarkers of increased coagulability and their incorporation in risk assessment models could identify patients most likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis but such models are not widely used in myeloma.
Insights
Patients with multiple myeloma face a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially when treated with immunomodulatory drugs. Current prophylaxis methods are insufficient, highlighting the need for better risk assessment and biomarker research.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Multiple myeloma (MM) patients have a significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications.
- VTE rates have risen with the use of novel agents, particularly immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) like thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the persistent challenge of VTE in multiple myeloma despite current prophylaxis strategies.
- To emphasize the critical need to differentiate between intrinsic VTE risk in MM and therapy-induced risk.
Main Methods:
- Review of current thromboprophylaxis recommendations for IMiD-based regimens in MM.
- Analysis of risk factors influencing VTE in MM patients.
- Discussion of the limitations of existing prophylaxis drugs (aspirin, LMWH, warfarin).
Main Results:
- Standard thromboprophylaxis, while recommended, does not completely eliminate VTE events in MM patients.
- Distinguishing intrinsic MM thrombosis risk from treatment effects is crucial for effective prevention.
Conclusions:
- Current thromboprophylaxis strategies for MM are not fully effective in preventing VTE.
- Further research into biomarkers and integrated risk assessment models is essential to identify high-risk patients who would benefit most from intensified prophylaxis.
More Related Videos
05:32Multimodal Bioluminescent and Positronic-emission Tomography/Computational Tomography Imaging of Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Xenografts in NOG Mice
Published on: January 7, 2019
04:40Author Spotlight: Advancing Cancer Associated Thrombosis Research in Rodent Models
Published on: January 5, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Overview of Systemic Veins
The coronary sinus, the heart's principal vein, resides in the coronary sulcus on the heart's posterior aspect. This broad venous channel receives nearly all venous blood from the myocardium, the heart muscle. It is fed by three primary veins: the great cardiac vein, the middle...
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management