Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Mechanistic Insight into the Development of TNBS-Mediated Intestinal Fibrosis and Evaluating the Inhibitory Effects of Rapamycin
Published on: September 12, 2019
Adaptations to chronic rapamycin in mice
Sherry G Dodds1, Carolina B Livi1,2, Manish Parihar1
1Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Abstract:
Rapamycin inhibits mechanistic (or mammalian) target of rapamycin (mTOR) that promotes protein production in cells by facilitating ribosome biogenesis (RiBi) and eIF4E-mediated 5'cap mRNA translation. Chronic treatment with encapsulated rapamycin (eRapa) extended health and life span for wild-type and cancer-prone mice. Yet, the long-term consequences of chronic eRapa treatment are not known at the organ level. Here, we report our observations of chronic eRapa treatment on mTORC1 signaling and RiBi in mouse colon and visceral adipose. As expected, chronic eRapa treatment decreased detection of phosphorylated mTORC1/S6K substrate, ribosomal protein (rpS6) in colon and fat. However, in colon, contrary to expectations, there was an upregulation of 18S rRNA and some ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) suggesting increased RiBi. Among RPGs, eRapa increases rpl22l1 mRNA but not its paralog rpl22. Furthermore, there was an increase in the cap-binding protein, eIF4E relative to its repressor 4E-BP1 suggesting increased translation. By comparison, in fat, there was a decrease in the level of 18S rRNA (opposite to colon), while overall mRNAs encoding ribosomal protein genes appeared to increase, including rpl22, but not rpl22l1 (opposite to colon). In fat, there was a decrease in eIF4E relative to actin (opposite to colon) but also an increase in the eIF4E/4E-BP1 ratio likely due to reductions in 4E-BP1 at our lower eRapa dose (similar to colon). Thus, in contrast to predictions of decreased protein production seen in cell-based studies, we provide evidence that colon from chronically treated mice exhibited an adaptive 'pseudo-anabolic' state, which is only partially present in fat, which might relate to differing tissue levels of rapamycin, cell-type-specific responses, and/or strain differences.
Insights
Chronic encapsulated rapamycin (eRapa) extends lifespan but has complex effects on cells. In mouse colon, eRapa unexpectedly increased ribosome biogenesis and translation, creating a pseudo-anabolic state, unlike in fat tissue.
Area of Science:
- Cellular and Molecular Biology
- Aging Research
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Rapamycin inhibits mTOR, a key regulator of protein synthesis.
- Chronic rapamycin treatment extends lifespan in mice.
- Long-term organ-level effects of rapamycin are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the long-term effects of encapsulated rapamycin (eRapa) on mTORC1 signaling and ribosome biogenesis (RiBi) in mouse colon and visceral adipose tissue.
- To determine if chronic eRapa treatment leads to decreased protein production at the organ level.
Main Methods:
- Mice were chronically treated with encapsulated rapamycin (eRapa).
- mTORC1 signaling was assessed by measuring phosphorylated S6K substrate, rpS6.
- Ribosome biogenesis (RiBi) was evaluated by quantifying 18S rRNA and ribosomal protein gene expression (RPGs).
- Translation initiation factors eIF4E and 4E-BP1 levels were measured.
Main Results:
- Chronic eRapa decreased phosphorylated rpS6 in both colon and fat, confirming mTORC1 inhibition.
- Unexpectedly, colon tissue showed increased 18S rRNA and RPGs, indicating enhanced RiBi and a 'pseudo-anabolic' state.
- Colon tissue also exhibited increased eIF4E relative to 4E-BP1, suggesting enhanced translation.
- Visceral adipose tissue showed opposite trends for 18S rRNA and differential regulation of specific RPGs and translation factors compared to colon.
Conclusions:
- Chronic eRapa treatment induces distinct, tissue-specific adaptive responses.
- The colon exhibits an adaptive 'pseudo-anabolic' state with increased RiBi and translation, contrasting with cell-based predictions.
- Fat tissue shows a different response pattern, possibly due to varying rapamycin levels, cell types, or genetic background.

