Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Baroness Coxand Section 28.

S Snape1

  • 1Camberwell London SW5 8AG.

Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
|May 31, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This letter addresses concerns regarding Baroness Cox's withdrawal from an HIV/AIDS conference. It challenges her claims of unfair attacks and her accusations against nurses disagreeing with her views on HIV/AIDS.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and internal validation of clinical prediction models for outcomes of complicated intra-abdominal infection.

The British journal of surgery·2021
Same author

Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery: difficult decisions in an era of evolving antibiotic resistance.

The bone & joint journal·2016
Same author

Investigating the impact of clinical anaesthetic practice on bacterial contamination of intravenous fluids and drugs.

The Journal of hospital infection·2015
Same author

A randomized controlled trial of botulinum toxin on lower limb spasticity following acute acquired severe brain injury.

Clinical rehabilitation·2005
Same author

Functional characterization of alternatively spliced human SERCA3 transcripts.

The American journal of physiology·1998
Same author

Endogenous interleukin-10 modulates proinflammatory response in Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

The Journal of infectious diseases·1998
Same journal

Effect of artificial intelligence on nursing documentation and patient safety.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Strategies for responding to anger from patients, relatives and carers.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Nurses' role in detecting early and subtle signs of patient deterioration in acute hospitals.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Pulse oximetry: exploring its role, limitations and challenges in clinical practice.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Anorexia nervosa: identification and management by non-specialist nurses.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
Same journal

Skin and soft tissue abscesses: assessment and management.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • A recent article in Nursing Standard by Baroness Cox discussed HIV and AIDS.
  • Baroness Cox withdrew from chairing an upcoming RCN/BMA conference on HIV and AIDS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To respond to Baroness Cox's article and her statements regarding her withdrawal from the HIV/AIDS conference.
  • To challenge Baroness Cox's characterization of criticism against her as 'unfounded,' 'misguided,' and 'malicious.'
  • To contest Baroness Cox's accusations of prejudice, bigotry, and unprofessionalism against nurses who hold differing views.

Main Methods:

  • A critical analysis of statements made by Baroness Cox in response to criticism.
  • An examination of the validity of accusations of prejudice and unprofessionalism leveled against dissenting nurses.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Baroness Cox's withdrawal from the conference is acknowledged.
  • Her claims of being a victim of unfair attacks are questioned.
  • Her accusations of prejudice and unprofessionalism against nurses are challenged due to a lack of evidence.

Conclusions:

  • The author asserts that Baroness Cox's accusations against nurses lack substantiation.
  • The letter calls for a challenge to these claims in the absence of evidence, promoting open discourse on HIV/AIDS issues.