Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.9K
Basic signals of Fourier Transform01:07

Basic signals of Fourier Transform

1.1K
The Fourier Transform is a pivotal mathematical tool in signal processing, enabling the transformation of time-domain signals into their frequency-domain representations. Among the numerous elements within this domain, certain functions like the sinc function, delta function, and exponential signals hold significant importance due to their unique properties and implications.
The sinc function, defined as sinc(x) = sin(πx)/(πx), is particularly notable for its symmetry and behavior at...
1.1K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.7K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.7K
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain01:26

Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain

423
Linear systems are characterized by two main properties: superposition and homogeneity. Superposition allows the response to multiple inputs to be the sum of the responses to each individual input. Homogeneity ensures that scaling an input by a scalar results in the response being scaled by the same scalar.
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....
423
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:24

Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

412
Proportional-Derivative (PD) controllers are widely used in fan control systems to improve stability and performance. A fan control system can be effectively represented using a Bode plot to illustrate the impact of a PD controller through its transfer function. The Bode plot visually conveys how PD control modifies the fan's response across various frequencies, providing a frequency domain interpretation of the controller's behavior.
The proportional control gain, combined with the...
412
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

569
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
569

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Case report: Pediatric vascular Behçet's disease with prominent arterial involvement: a case series of five patients.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

C1 pedicle screw placement risks in patients with ponticulus posticus: a CTA retrospective simulation study.

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research·2026
Same author

Clinical benefits and current challenges of photon-counting detector CT in vascular imaging.

Radiology advances·2026
Same author

Hallucination at low radiation dose: Evaluation of two deep-learning reconstruction methods in high-resolution chest CT.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same author

Efficacy and Safety of Thalidomidein Patients with Transfusion-Dependent B-Thalassemia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and GRADE Evaluation.

Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases·2026
Same author

The Uncoupling of CT Dose and Noise.

Radiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.8K

Predicting detection performance with model observers: Fourier domain or spatial domain?

Baiyu Chen1, Lifeng Yu1, Shuai Leng1

  • 1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

Proceedings of Spie--The International Society for Optical Engineering
|May 31, 2016
PubMed
Summary

The spatial domain model observer accurately predicts human performance in CT image analysis, unlike the Fourier domain observer which struggles with iterative reconstruction images. This finding is crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy in medical imaging.

Keywords:
Computed tomography (CT)channelized Hotelling observer (CHO)detectability index (d’)iterative reconstruction (IR)model observernon-prewhitening

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.8K
Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Radiology
  • Computational Imaging

Background:

  • Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms in CT imaging present challenges for traditional Fourier domain model observers due to nonlinearities and unique noise textures.
  • Existing Fourier domain observers require modification to account for IR properties, necessitating validation against human performance.
  • Spatial domain model observers are theoretically suitable for IR but are computationally demanding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of a modified Fourier domain model observer against a spatial domain model observer.
  • To validate these model observers against human detection performance using both Filtered Back Projection (FBP) and IR images.
  • To assess the correlation of model observer performance with human observers across varying imaging conditions.

Main Methods:

  • A phantom study was conducted using a dual-source CT scanner with varying dose levels, contrast, and object sizes.
  • Images were reconstructed using both FBP and IR algorithms.
  • Human detection performance was assessed using a 2-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) test.
  • Fourier domain non-prewhitening and spatial domain channelized Hotelling observers were implemented and evaluated.

Main Results:

  • The spatial domain model observer demonstrated strong correlation with human observer performance across all tested parameters (dose, contrast, size).
  • The Fourier domain model observer correlated well with human observers for FBP images.
  • The Fourier domain model observer overestimated detection performance for IR images.

Conclusions:

  • The spatial domain model observer is a reliable tool for predicting human detection performance in CT imaging, including with IR techniques.
  • Modified Fourier domain observers need further refinement to accurately model IR image characteristics.
  • The spatial domain approach offers a more robust alternative for evaluating image quality and observer performance in modern CT reconstruction.