Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026
Auricular Point Acupressure Therapy: A Safe and Effective Treatment for Postsurgical Abortion Recovery
Published on: February 3, 2026
Choice of primary outcomes evaluating treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding
M C Herman1, Jpm Penninx1, P M Geomini1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Background:
Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common problem with a variety of treatment options and many studies have been performed evaluating treatment effects. Consistency in the choice and definition of primary and secondary outcomes is important for the interpretation of data and for the synthesis of data in systematic reviews or individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA).
Objective:
To give insight into the primary endpoints and outcome measures chosen in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews regarding the treatment of HMB.
Search Strategy:
Published systematic reviews and RCTs.
Selection Criteria:
Full reports of RCTs or systematic reviews.
Data Collection And Analysis:
For RCTs, we used the primary outcomes, as they were used for the sample size calculation. For systematic reviews, all outcomes listed as primary were included. Four authors selected the studies.
Results:
Twelve different primary outcomes were reported by 66 RCTs, most blood loss- related (44/66 studies). Amenorrhoea was the most common blood loss primary outcome (16/44 studies) and the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) was the most used measurement tool (27/44 studies). Satisfaction was the second most prevalent primary outcome measure (13/66 studies). In all, 14/26 (54%) systematic reviews prespecified a single primary outcome, whereas all other reviews used composite primary outcomes. Blood loss was the most studied outcome (12/26 reviews).
Conclusions:
The most used primary outcomes in HMB studies relate to blood loss but there is no consistency regarding the endpoints chosen or measurement tools used to describe blood loss. Standardising outcomes will aid valid comparison and interpretation of data pertaining to the treatment of HMB.
Tweetable Abstract:
A standardised collection of outcomes in heavy menstrual bleeding research is urgently needed.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
05:21Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
Published on: September 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
01:22Hormonal Regulation of the Menstrual Cycle
At puberty, GnRH begins a pulsatile release pattern, which triggers the anterior pituitary gland to secrete follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). The frequency and amplitude of GnRH pulses vary across the menstrual cycle, with faster pulses favoring LH release and slower pulses favoring FSH...
01:28Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...