Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

669
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
669
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

16.5K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
16.5K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

29.5K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
29.5K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

4.1K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autoinhibitory feedback preserves intestinal stem cell maintenance and fate commitment.

The EMBO journal·2026
Same author

Dual role of ZIC2 during neural induction: from priming transcription factor to enhancer activator.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Genome-scale mapping of variant, enhancer and gene function in primary human CD4+ T cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Reprogramming of stroma-derived chemokine networks drives the loss of tissue organization in nodal B cell lymphoma.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

Single-cell ultra-high-throughput multiplexed chromatin accessibility and gene expression sequencing (SUM-seq).

Nature protocols·2026
Same author

Immunoglobulin heavy-chain status and stromal interactions shape ferroptosis sensitivity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Signal transduction and targeted therapy·2026
Same journal

Efficient evidence-based genome annotation with EviAnn.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

ClairS: a deep-learning method for long-read tumor-normal pair somatic small variant calling.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

RNAbpFlow: base pair-augmented SE(3) flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Spatio-DARLIN enables robust and efficient in situ lineage tracing in mice at single-cell resolution.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

EasyGrid: a versatile platform for automated cryo-EM sample preparation and quality control.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Cloud-based microscope enables live neuroimaging for 24 h and beyond with worldwide access.

Nature methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.5K

Data-driven hypothesis weighting increases detection power in genome-scale multiple testing.

Nikolaos Ignatiadis1, Bernd Klaus1, Judith B Zaugg1

  • 1European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.

Nature Methods
|May 31, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Independent hypothesis weighting (IHW) enhances the power of large-scale multiple testing. This method uses covariates to assign weights, improving the discovery of significant associations in big data analyses.

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.5K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • High-throughput biology
  • Statistical genetics

Background:

  • Large-scale multiple testing is common in genomics and high-throughput biology.
  • Controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) while maximizing statistical power is a key challenge.
  • Existing methods may not fully leverage available covariate information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce Independent Hypothesis Weighting (IHW) as a novel method for hypothesis weighting.
  • To improve the power of large-scale multiple testing procedures.
  • To provide a practical tool for association discovery in large datasets.

Main Methods:

  • IHW assigns weights to hypotheses based on covariates.
  • Covariates are independent of P-values under the null hypothesis.
  • Weights reflect the power or prior probability of the null hypothesis for each test.

Main Results:

  • IHW demonstrably increases statistical power.
  • The method effectively controls the false discovery rate (FDR).
  • IHW offers a practical approach for large-scale data analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Independent Hypothesis Weighting (IHW) is an effective strategy for enhancing multiple testing power.
  • The IHW method provides a robust framework for association discovery in complex biological data.
  • This approach is applicable to genomics, high-throughput biology, and other fields with large datasets.