Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Top-Down Dysregulation-From ADHD to Emotional Instability
Predrag Petrovic1, F Xavier Castellanos2
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden.
Emotional and cognitive dysregulation may explain more ADHD symptoms. This model integrates attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with emotional instability disorders by viewing executive functions on a gradient from cool to hot processes.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychiatry
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is traditionally linked to deficient cognitive top-down executive control, explaining only a modest part of its phenotype.
- Emotional dysregulation is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in ADHD.
- Existing models do not fully capture the interplay between cognitive and emotional deficits in ADHD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a unified model of top-down dysregulation that spans from non-emotional ('cool') executive functions to emotional regulation ('hot') processes.
- To integrate ADHD, emotional traits in ADHD, and personality disorders like borderline and antisocial personality disorder within this gradient framework.
- To explore the neuroanatomical and neurochemical underpinnings of this proposed gradient.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual model development integrating existing research on executive functions, emotional regulation, and neurobiology.
- Neuroanatomical mapping of 'cool' executive functions to prefrontal cortex (dlPFC, cACC) and 'hot' functions to orbitofrontal cortex (rACC).
- Examination of basal ganglia and dopamine system involvement in processing exteroceptive (cool) versus interoceptive (hot) information.
Main Results:
- A gradient model of top-down dysregulation is proposed, encompassing both cognitive and emotional control.
- ADHD is positioned primarily towards the 'cool' end, while personality disorders are closer to the 'hot' end, with emotional ADHD subtypes in between.
- Distinct neuroanatomical circuits (prefrontal vs. orbitofrontal) and processing systems (exteroceptive vs. interoceptive) are associated with 'cool' and 'hot' functions.
Conclusions:
- The proposed gradient framework offers a more comprehensive explanation for the phenotypic variance in ADHD, including emotional aspects.
- This model provides a potential neurobiological basis for understanding the relationship between ADHD and emotional dysregulation disorders.
- The framework may help integrate seemingly distinct conditions into a related cluster of mental health challenges.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
13:09Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Borderline Personality Disorder
Genetic and Environmental Contributions
Borderline Personality...
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Bipolar Disorder
Personality Disorders: Schizotypal and Histrionic
Schizotypal Personality Disorder: Eccentric Behavior and Social Withdrawal
Schizotypal personality disorder is marked by odd or eccentric...
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...