Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Lisa Carter-Harris1, James E Slaven, Patrick Monohan
1Author Affiliations: Indiana University School of Nursing (Drs Carter-Harris and Rawl); and Indiana University School of Medicine, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics (Mr Slaven and Dr Monahan), Indianapolis, Indiana.
Background:
Lung cancer screening is a recent recommendation for long-term smokers. Understanding individual health beliefs about screening is a critical component in future efforts to facilitate patient-provider conversations about screening participation.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to describe the development and psychometric testing of 4 new scales to measure lung cancer screening health beliefs (perceived risk, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy).
Methods:
In phase I, 4 scales were developed from extensive literature review, item modification from existing Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales, focus groups with long-term smokers, and evaluation/feedback from a panel of 10 content experts. In phase II, we conducted a survey of 497 long-term smokers to assess the final scales' reliability and validity.
Results:
Phase I: content validity was established with the content expert panel. Phase II: internal consistency reliability of the scales was supported with Cronbach's α's ranging from .88 to .92. Construct validity was established with confirmatory factor analysis and testing for differences between screeners and nonscreeners in theoretically proposed directions.
Conclusions:
Initial testing supports the scales are valid and reliable. These new scales can help investigators identify long-term smokers more likely to screen for lung cancer and are useful for the development and testing of behavioral interventions regarding lung cancer screening.
Implications For Practice:
Development of effective interventions to enhance shared decision making about lung cancer screening between patients and providers must first identify factors influencing the individual's screening participation. Future efforts facilitating patient-provider conversations are better informed by understanding the perspective of the individual making the decision.
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Concepts of Health and Illness
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Cancer Prevention