Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026
05:21
Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
Published on: September 12, 2025
677
Peritoneal closure during laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
Holm Eggemann1, Nara Asbahr Mitrik2, Otto Kabdebo2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinic Magdeburg, Germany, Gerhart-Hauptmann Str. 35, 39108, Magdeburg, Germany. holm.eggemann@med.ovgu.de.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
|June 2, 2016
Summary
Closing the peritoneum during laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) offers no short-term benefits for pain or recovery. This study suggests that peritoneal closure is unnecessary, potentially reducing operative time.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
- Surgical Techniques and Outcomes
Background:
- The necessity of peritoneal closure during laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) remains a topic of debate in gynecologic surgery.
- Understanding the impact of peritoneal closure on postoperative pain and recovery is crucial for optimizing surgical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare postoperative pain and analgesic requirements between women undergoing LSH with and without peritoneal closure.
- To evaluate the effect of peritoneal closure on operative time and postoperative complications.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study involving 104 patients undergoing LSH.
- Patients were divided into two groups: those with peritoneal closure (n=52) and those without (n=52).
- Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and analgesic requirements were recorded. Operative time and complications were also monitored.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in VAS pain scores or analgesic requirements between the two groups.
- Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) without peritoneal closure was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (median reduction of 9 minutes).
- Intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as hospital stay, were similar in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Peritoneal closure during LSH does not provide short-term postoperative advantages regarding pain or recovery.
- The non-closure approach for the peritoneum in LSH is associated with a reduced operative time and anesthetic exposure.
- The findings suggest that peritoneal closure is not a necessary component of LSH procedures.
