Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Insertion, Maintenance, and Removal of the Percutaneous Dual Lumen Cannula Right Ventricular Assist Device
Published on: July 20, 2022
Providing Context: Medical Device Litigation and Inferior Vena Cava Filters
Eric J Keller1, Robert L Vogelzang2
1Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract:
Over the last few years, an increasing number of lawsuits have been filed involving inferior vena cava filters. This has prompted the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to centralize these lawsuits into two multidistrict litigations: one for Cook's filters and one for Bard's. Both sets of cases share similar questions of facts, in particular whether these filters' design and manufacturing practices made them unreasonably prone to serious complications. The resolution of these cases will add to a larger legal debate concerning how much legal protection the 1976 Medical Device Amendments should offer firms from tort liability. As a specialty that often relies on medical devices, it is not only important for interventional radiologists to have a general understanding of medical device litigation but also to reflect upon the approaches to informed consent regarding these devices.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications

