Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Can Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability Contribute to Individual Cardiovascular Risk Stratification?
Annamária Magdás1, László Szilágyi2, Alexandru Incze1
1Department for Internal Medicine IV, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tîrgu Mureş, Strada Gheorghe Marinescu No. 1, 3rd Floor, 540103 Tîrgu Mureş, Romania.
Insights
High blood pressure variability, measured as average real variability (ARV), is a cardiovascular risk factor. Reducing this variability may be as crucial as managing blood pressure levels.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Clinical Risk Assessment
Background:
- Blood pressure variability (BPV) is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in cardiovascular health.
- Understanding normal ranges for BPV metrics like average real variability (ARV) is crucial for risk stratification.
- Current guidelines primarily focus on average blood pressure levels, potentially overlooking the impact of variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish the normal range for average real variability (ARV) in treated hypertensive patients.
- To determine if ARV can serve as an independent cardiovascular risk factor.
- To investigate the relationship between ARV levels and other cardiovascular risk indicators.
Main Methods:
- An observational study involving 110 treated hypertensive patients undergoing antihypertensive treatment adjustment.
- 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess circadian blood pressure and calculate ARV.
- Classification of patients into low, medium, and high ARV groups using the fuzzy c-means algorithm.
- Comparison of cardiovascular risk markers, including glomerular filtration rate, across different ARV groups using ANOVA.
Main Results:
- Normal ARV ranges were defined: low (<9.8 mmHg), medium (9.8-12.8 mmHg), and high (>12.8 mmHg).
- Significant differences in mean systolic blood pressure (p=0.0113) and glomerular filtration rate (p=0.0261) were observed between ARV groups.
- Higher ARV levels correlated with increased systolic blood pressure and reduced kidney function.
Conclusions:
- Elevated average real variability (ARV) is identified as an additional cardiovascular risk factor.
- Managing blood pressure variability may be as vital as achieving target blood pressure levels.
- Further research is needed to establish universally accepted ARV threshold values for clinical practice.
Abstract:
Objective. The aim of this study is to define the normal range for average real variability (ARV) and to establish whether it can be considered as an additional cardiovascular risk factor. Methods. In this observational study, 110 treated hypertensive patients were included and admitted for antihypertensive treatment adjustment. Circadian blood pressure was recorded with validated devices. Blood pressure variability (BPV) was assessed according to the ARV definition. Based on their variability, patients were classified into low, medium, and high variability groups using the fuzzy c-means algorithm. To assess cardiovascular risk, blood samples were collected. Characteristics of the groups were compared by ANOVA tests. Results. Low variability was defined as ARV below 9.8 mmHg (32 patients), medium as 9.8-12.8 mmHg (48 patients), and high variability above 12.8 mmHg (30 patients). Mean systolic blood pressure was 131.2 ± 16.7, 135.0 ± 12.1, and 141.5 ± 11.4 mmHg in the low, medium, and high variability groups, respectively (p = 0.0113). Glomerular filtration rate was 78.6 ± 29.3, 74.8 ± 26.4, and 62.7 ± 23.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the low, medium, and high variability groups, respectively (p = 0.0261). Conclusion. Increased values of average real variability represent an additional cardiovascular risk factor. Therefore, reducing BP variability might be as important as achieving optimal BP levels, but there is need for further studies to define a widely acceptable threshold value.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

