Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A model for biocompatibility and its evaluation.

D F Williams1

  • 1Institute of Medical and Dental Bioengineering, University of Liverpool, UK.

Journal of Biomedical Engineering
|May 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Professional standards in failure analysis and expert reports.

The International journal of risk & safety in medicine·2013
Same author

Multicenter study to assess potential hazards from exposure to lipid peroxidation products in soya bean oil from Trilucent breast implants.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2008
Same author

Influence of test protocol in determining the blood response to model polymers.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2004
Same author

Activation status of platelet aggregates and platelet microparticles shed in sheared whole blood.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2004
Same author

From cytotoxicity to biocompatibility testing in vitro: cell adhesion molecule expression defines a new set of parameters.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2004
Same author

The effect of temperature and shear rate on platelet aggregation.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2004
Same journal

Comparative study of the function of the Abiomed polyurethane heart valve for use in left ventricular assist devices.

Journal of biomedical engineering·1993
Same journal

AZTDIS--a two-phase real-time ECG data compressor.

Journal of biomedical engineering·1993
Same journal

Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone.

Journal of biomedical engineering·1993
Same journal

Three dimensional shape reconstruction and finite element analysis of femur before and after the cementless type of total hip replacement.

Journal of biomedical engineering·1993
Same journal

The Rancho EMG analyzer: a computerized system for gait analysis.

Journal of biomedical engineering·1993
Same journal

Preparation and in vivo evaluation of a newly developed bioglass ceramic.

Journal of biomedical engineering·1993
See all related articles

Biocompatibility concepts have evolved, focusing on new mediators and assessment models. This paper outlines current knowledge and proposes updated biocompatibility evaluation procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Medical Device Engineering
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Traditional biocompatibility concepts are outdated.
  • Recent advancements necessitate a reevaluation of biocompatibility principles.
  • Understanding the complex interactions between materials and biological systems is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the evolution of biocompatibility concepts.
  • To present current knowledge on biocompatibility components and mediators.
  • To develop a model for explaining and rationalizing biocompatibility phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of recent advancements in biocompatibility.
  • Analysis of components and mediators influencing biological responses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a conceptual model for biocompatibility assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Radical changes in understanding biocompatibility have occurred.
    • A new model for explaining biocompatibility phenomena has been developed.
    • The importance of updated biocompatibility assessment is highlighted.

    Conclusions:

    • Biocompatibility assessment must incorporate new scientific thinking.
    • A schedule for biocompatibility evaluation procedures is needed.
    • The proposed model aids in rationalizing biocompatibility phenomena.