Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026
Probiotic Studies in Neonatal Mice Using Gavage
Published on: January 27, 2019
Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps
J A Cartwright1, T L Hill1, S Smith1
1Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.
Background:
Sample quality of gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsies is of paramount importance for accurate histological diagnosis. Many veterinary practices use reusable forceps as a result of perceived decreased cost. With reusable forceps, it remains unknown whether sample quality declines with repeated use and becomes inferior to single-use forceps and is therefore more or less cost effective than single-use forceps.
Hypothesis/Objectives:
The study hypothesis was that reusable forceps sample quality would deteriorate after repeated use as compared to single-use forceps.
Animals:
Sixty-five dogs undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy for diagnostic investigations at the Hospital for Small Animals, Edinburgh University.
Method:
A prospective, pathologist-blinded study comparing single-use and reusable alligator standard cup biopsy forceps (Olympus 2.0 mm 1550 mm) with 5 randomized reusable forceps. Sample quality (stomach, duodenum, ileum, and colon) was assessed by a single pathologist using the WSAVA guidelines.
Results:
There was no difference in the adequacy, depth, villi number, or crush artifact in the 4 intestinal areas between forceps type with at least 10, and up to 15, repeated uses of the reusable forceps.
Conclusions And Clinical Importance:
This study demonstrates that reusable cup biopsy forceps provide equivalent biopsy quality after repeated uses to single-use forceps and are cost effective at 10-case use.
