Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains
Published on: November 30, 2021
Genomic and archaeological evidence suggest a dual origin of domestic dogs
Laurent A F Frantz1, Victoria E Mullin2, Maud Pionnier-Capitan3
1The Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. laurent.frantz@arch.ox.ac.uk greger.larson@arch.ox.ac.uk dbradley@tcd.ie.
Abstract:
The geographic and temporal origins of dogs remain controversial. We generated genetic sequences from 59 ancient dogs and a complete (28x) genome of a late Neolithic dog (dated to ~4800 calendar years before the present) from Ireland. Our analyses revealed a deep split separating modern East Asian and Western Eurasian dogs. Surprisingly, the date of this divergence (~14,000 to 6400 years ago) occurs commensurate with, or several millennia after, the first appearance of dogs in Europe and East Asia. Additional analyses of ancient and modern mitochondrial DNA revealed a sharp discontinuity in haplotype frequencies in Europe. Combined, these results suggest that dogs may have been domesticated independently in Eastern and Western Eurasia from distinct wolf populations. East Eurasian dogs were then possibly transported to Europe with people, where they partially replaced European Paleolithic dogs.
Related Concept Videos
Incomplete Dominance
Convergent Evolution
The Evidence for Evolution
What is Evolutionary History?
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
The Fossil Record

