Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Permanent Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Use After Acute Stabilization for Cardiogenic Shock in
Josephine Chou1, Christian Bermudez, Robert Kormos
1From the *Heart and Vascular Institute, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts; †Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and ‡Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Insights
Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) show promise for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction (CS-AMI). While high-risk, CF-LVADs offer survival benefits for select CS-AMI patients stabilized with temporary support.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Mechanical Circulatory Support
- Cardiovascular Surgery
Background:
- Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarctions (CS-AMIs) has a high mortality rate.
- Early implantation of durable continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) in CS-AMI patients is often discouraged.
- Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is frequently used for CS-AMI stabilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy and complications of CF-LVAD implantation in CS-AMI patients.
- To evaluate outcomes after stabilization with temporary mechanical support.
- To determine the long-term survival and complication profile of CF-LVADs in this high-risk population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of nine CS-AMI patients who received CF-LVADs (Heartmate II or HVAD) between January 2006 and November 2014.
- All patients required prior temporary MCS and were classified as Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile 1.
- Data collected included time from MI to CF-LVAD implant, survival rates, and post-operative complications.
Main Results:
- Seven out of nine patients (78%) survived to discharge.
- Long-term survival rates at 1, 3, 12, and 48 months were 100%, 89%, 67%, and 67%, respectively.
- The most frequent complication was stroke (55%), with mild embolic strokes and higher mortality associated with hemorrhagic strokes.
Conclusions:
- CF-LVADs represent a potential, albeit high-risk, treatment option for select CS-AMI patients stabilized with temporary support.
- Two patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation, and four remain alive on device support.
- Further research is needed to clarify the precise benefits and risks of CF-LVADs in the CS-AMI population.
Abstract:
Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarctions (CS-AMIs) carries high mortality rates. Early use of durable continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) in these patients has traditionally been discouraged. Therefore we sought to assess the efficacy and complications of CF-LVAD use in CS-AMI after stabilization with temporary mechanical support. From January 2006 to November 2014, nine patients underwent CF-LVAD implant after CS-AMI (Heartmate II, six; HVAD, three). All patients required temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) before CF-LVAD implant and were interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support profile 1; average time from MI to CF-LVAD implant was 20 days. Overall seven of nine patients (78%) survived to discharge. Survival at 1, 3, 12, and 48 months was 100%, 89%, 67%, and 67%, respectively. Two patients were successfully bridged to transplant and four patients remain alive on device support. The most common post-LVAD complication was stroke, occurring in 55% of patients. Embolic strokes were mild in severity and all patients survived with only mild deficits; hemorrhagic strokes conferred the highest mortality. This study suggests CF-LVADs are potential but high-risk treatment options for CS-AMI patients who stabilize with temporary support. Further studies will help more clearly delineate the benefits and risks of CF-LVAD implant in this population.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

