Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Echocardiographic Assessment Using Subxiphoid-Only Examination for Hypotensive Patients
Published on: April 18, 2025
Comprehensive characterisation of hypertensive heart disease left ventricular phenotypes
Jonathan C L Rodrigues1, Antonio Matteo Amadu2, Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar3
1NIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Department, Bristol Heart Institute, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neurosciences, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, UK.
Objective:
Myocardial intracellular/extracellular structure and aortic function were assessed among hypertensive left ventricular (LV) phenotypes using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).
Methods:
An observational study from consecutive tertiary hypertension clinic patients referred for CMR (1.5 T) was performed. Four LV phenotypes were defined: (1) normal with normal indexed LV mass (LVM) and LVM to volume ratio (M/V), (2) concentric remodelling with normal LVM but elevated M/V, (3) concentric LV hypertrophy (LVH) with elevated LVM but normal indexed end-diastolic volume (EDV) or (4) eccentric LVH with elevated LVM and EDV. Extracellular volume fraction was measured using T1-mapping. Circumferential strain was calculated by voxel-tracking. Aortic distensibility was derived from high-resolution aortic cines and contemporaneous blood pressure measurements.
Results:
88 hypertensive patients (49±14 years, 57% men, systolic blood pressure (SBP): 167±30 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP): 96±14 mm Hg) were compared with 29 age-matched/sex-matched controls (47±14 years, 59% men, SBP: 128±12 mm Hg, DBP: 79±10 mm Hg). LVH resulted from increased myocardial cell volume (eccentric LVH: 78±19 mL/m(2) vs concentric LVH: 73±15 mL/m(2) vs concentric remodelling: 55±9 mL/m(2), p<0.05, respectively) and interstitial fibrosis (eccentric LVH: 33±10 mL/m(2) vs concentric LVH: 30±10 mL/m(2) vs concentricremodelling: 19±2 mL/m(2), p<0.05, respectively). LVH had worst circumferential impairment (eccentric LVH: -12.8±4.6% vs concentric LVH: -15.5±3.1% vs concentric remodelling: -17.1±3.2%, p<0.05, respectively). Concentric remodelling was associated with reduced aortic distensibility, but not with large intracellular/interstitial expansion or myocardial dysfunction versus controls.
Conclusions:
Myocardial interstitial fibrosis varies across hypertensive LV phenotypes with functional consequences. Eccentric LVH has the most fibrosis and systolic impairment. Concentric remodelling is only associated with abnormal aortic function. Understanding these differences may help tailor future antihypertensive treatments.
More Related Videos
07:41Induction and Phenotyping of Acute Right Heart Failure in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Published on: March 17, 2022
07:13A Rat Model of Pressure Overload Induced Moderate Remodeling and Systolic Dysfunction as Opposed to Overt Systolic Heart Failure
Published on: April 30, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Pulmonary Hypertension: Classification and Pathogenesis
There are various classifications for PH, each relating to different underlying causes and also...