Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
Published on: July 5, 2011
Standardized reporting of adverse events after microvascular decompression of cranial nerves; a population-based
Jiri Bartek1,2, Sasha Gulati3,4, Geirmund Unsgård3,4
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Section for Neurosurgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. jiri.bartek@karolinska.se.
Objective:
To investigate frequencies of adverse events occurring within 30 days after microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery using a standardized report form of adverse events.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective review of 98 adult patients (≥16 years) treated with MVD between 1 January 1994 and 1 June 2013. Adverse events occurring within 30 days were classified according to the Landriel Ibanez classification for neurosurgical complications: grade I represents any non-life threatening complication treated without invasive procedures; grade II is complications requiring invasive management; grade III is life-threatening adverse events requiring treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU); grade IV is death as a result of complications. We sought to compare our results with reports from the literature.
Results:
Patients' median age was 61 years (range 26-83), and 64 (65 %) were females. Indications for MVD were trigeminal neuralgia (n = 77, 79 %), glossopharyngeal neuralgia (n = 4, 4 %), hemifacial spasm (n = 16, 16 %) and combined trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm (n = 1, 1 %). The overall 30-day complication rate was 20 %, with 14 % grade I complications, 5 % grade II complications and 1 % grade III complications. The comparison with the literature was hampered by the diverse and unsystematic way of reporting complications.
Conclusion:
We provide a standardized report of postoperative complications in a consecutive patient series undergoing MVD. Due to the heterogeneous and non-standardized reporting of complications in the literature, it is difficult to know if our 20 % complication rate is low or high. Standardized reporting is a necessity for meaningful and more valid comparisons across studies. The safety of MVD, a fairly standardized neurosurgical procedure, is well suited for comparisons across centers provided that complications are reported in a standardized manner.
Insights
This study reports a 20% adverse event rate within 30 days following microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery. Standardized reporting is crucial for comparing MVD complication rates across studies.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Patient Safety
- Clinical Outcomes
Background:
- Microvascular decompression (MVD) is a neurosurgical procedure to treat conditions like trigeminal neuralgia.
- Assessing the safety and complication rates of MVD is essential for patient care.
- Existing literature lacks standardized reporting of adverse events following MVD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the frequency of adverse events within 30 days after microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery.
- To establish a standardized method for reporting MVD-related complications.
- To compare MVD complication rates with existing literature.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 98 adult patients undergoing MVD between 1994 and 2013.
- Classification of adverse events using the Landriel Ibanez classification for neurosurgical complications (grades I-IV).
- Analysis of complication rates and comparison with literature data.
Main Results:
- The overall 30-day complication rate was 20%.
- Grade I complications (non-life-threatening, no invasive procedures) occurred in 14% of patients.
- Grade II (invasive management) and Grade III (life-threatening, ICU) complications occurred in 5% and 1% of patients, respectively.
- Comparison with literature was limited due to inconsistent reporting.
Conclusions:
- A standardized report of postoperative complications in MVD patients was provided.
- The heterogeneous reporting in the literature hinders accurate comparison of MVD complication rates.
- Standardized complication reporting is necessary for valid cross-study comparisons and assessing MVD safety.
More Related Videos
04:06Author Spotlight: Minimally Invasive Relief for Occipital Neuralgia at the Nuchal Line
Published on: September 13, 2024
03:24Author Spotlight: Development and Application of a Novel Suture Technique for Annular Fibrosus Repair in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy
Published on: January 26, 2024