Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Design and Implementation of a Bespoke Robotic Manipulator for Extra-corporeal Ultrasound
Published on: January 7, 2019
Evaluation of three force-position hybrid control methods for a robot-based biological joint-testing system
Hong-Jung Hsieh1,2, Chih-Chung Hu1,3, Tung-Wu Lu4,5
1Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan, R.O.C.
The new force-position hybrid control with force-moment control (FPHFM) method best reduces constraining forces and moments in robot-based joint-testing systems (RJTS) for knee laxity tests. While increasing test time, FPHFM offers superior safety and accuracy for clinical applications.
Area of Science:
- Robotics in biomechanics
- Orthopedic biomechanics
- Control systems engineering
Background:
- Robot-based joint-testing systems (RJTS) enable unconstrained laxity tests, measuring joint stiffness.
- Previous force-position hybrid (FPH) control methods focused on anterior/posterior knee laxity, with limited evaluation for valgus/varus movements.
- The applicability of FPH control for diverse degrees of freedom (DOF) in knee laxity testing requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop a 6-DOF RJTS using an industrial robot.
- Propose novel force-position hybrid control methods: force-position alternate control (FPA) and force-position hybrid control with force-moment control (FPHFM).
- Evaluate and compare the performance of FPH, FPA, and FPHFM for anterior/posterior and valgus/varus knee laxity tests.
Main Methods:
- An industrial 6-DOF robot equipped with a 6-component load cell was utilized for the RJTS.
- FPH, FPA, and FPHFM control methods were implemented and evaluated for unconstrained anterior/posterior and valgus/varus laxity tests.
- Performance metrics included control iterations, total time, and constraining forces/moments, compared against traditional constrained tests (CT).
Main Results:
- FPHFM, FPA, and FPH significantly reduced constraining forces and moments compared to CT for both anterior/posterior and valgus/varus tests.
- FPHFM demonstrated the lowest root-mean-squared constraining forces (<2.3 N) and moments (<0.14 Nm) across flexion angles.
- FPHFM and FPA achieved greater load reduction than FPH but required more control iterations and increased total testing time.
Conclusions:
- Force-position hybrid control with force-moment control (FPHFM) is the optimal method for unconstrained knee laxity testing when increased test duration is acceptable.
- The study provides valuable insights for selecting appropriate force-position hybrid control strategies for RJTS in clinical settings.
- FPHFM offers enhanced safety and accuracy in robotic knee laxity assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving
To solve a three-dimensional force system, first resolve each force into its respective scalar components. Do this using...
Three-Dimensional Force System
Support Reactions in Three Dimensions
Ball and Socket Joint is one of the supports allowing free rotation about any axis. This freedom of rotation is...
Two-Dimensional Force System: Problem Solving
The first step to solving a two-dimensional force system problem is to draw a free-body diagram of the object under consideration. This diagram helps identify all the external forces acting on the object, including their...
Two-Dimensional Force System
One-Degree-of-Freedom System
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...

