Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus miscuing, electrodermal activity, and the allocation of processing resources.

J S Packer, D A Siddle

    Psychophysiology
    |March 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The effects of change in lead stimulus modality on the modulation of acoustic blink startle.

    Psychophysiology·2000
    Same author

    Pain relief using smart technology: an overview of a new patient-controlled analgesia device.

    IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2000
    Same author

    The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks.

    Psychophysiology·2000
    Same author

    Smart technology improves patient-controlled analgesia: a preliminary report.

    Anesthesia and analgesia·1999
    Same author

    The effects of threat and nonthreat word lead stimuli on blink modification.

    Psychophysiology·1999
    Same author

    Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses.

    Psychophysiology·1998
    Same journal

    What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

    Psychophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

    Psychophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

    Psychophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

    Psychophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    Probing Prediction-Related Processes in Language Using an EEG Word Stem Completion Paradigm.

    Psychophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    sBOSC: A Method for Source-Level Identification of Neural Oscillations in Electromagnetic Brain Signals.

    Psychophysiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Stimulus miscuing disrupts electrodermal responses and expectancy. Unexpectedly presented stimuli, even after miscuing, require significant cognitive processing resources.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Learning and Memory

    Background:

    • Stimulus expectancy plays a crucial role in cognitive processing.
    • Understanding how unexpected events impact physiological and cognitive responses is key to learning theories.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of stimulus miscuing on electrodermal responding and stimulus expectancy.
    • To examine the allocation of processing resources using reaction time to secondary task probes.
    • To explore dishabituation following a miscuing event.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments were conducted with control and experimental groups.
    • Electrodermal responding and continuous measures of stimulus expectancy were recorded (Experiment 1).
    • Probe reaction time to a secondary task was measured following stimulus presentations (Experiment 2).

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Stimulus miscuing by S3 elicited reliable electrodermal responding and dishabituation.
    • Participants showed reduced expectation for S2 following S3 during miscuing.
    • Slower reaction times to probe stimuli indicated increased processing resource allocation for both miscuing and re-presentation trials.

    Conclusions:

    • Both stimulus miscuing and subsequent re-presentation demand cognitive processing resources.
    • Findings support theories of associative learning and the role of expectancy in cognitive control.