Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Impression Cytology of the Lid Wiper Area
Published on: August 9, 2016
Eyelid Margin and Meibomian Gland Characteristics and Symptoms in Lens Wearers
Stephanie M Cox1, David A Berntsen, Neil Chatterjee
1*OD, FAAO †OD, PhD, FAAO ‡BSc, MSc, MCOptom §BSc, MCOptom, FAAO ∥PhD, FCOptom, FAAO **MSc, BOptom ††BSc, PhD, MCOptom, FAAO ‡‡OD, MPH, PhD, FAAO The University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Optometry, Birmingham, Alabama (SMC, JJN); The Ocular Surface Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas (DAB); Eurolens Research, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (NC, PBM); Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida (SBH-C); and Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (LWJ, AMM).
Purpose:
To describe the lid margin characteristics of contact lens wearers and relate them to comfort during lens wear.
Methods:
Three study sites enrolled habitual contact lens wearers. Subjects completed the Comfort domain of the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) questionnaire, and each eye was graded for the presence of mucocutaneous junction (MCJ) displacement, lid margin irregularity, and lid margin vascularity. Examiners counted the number of meibomian gland (MG) orifices in the central centimeter of the lower eyelid and the number of those that showed pouting/plugging and vascular invasion. MG expressibility was graded according to the Shimazaki schema. Subjects were grouped based on presence/absence of each characteristic, total number of orifices (≥5 vs. <5), and expressibility (grade 0 vs. >0). Descriptive statistics are reported. A linear model was used to assess the fixed effect of each characteristic on combined CLUE score and each CLUE statement, if the effect on combined CLUE score showed p < 0.10.
Results:
The study included 203 subjects (67.5% female) with mean age (±SD) of 30.3 ± 9.6 years. The most commonly observed characteristics were orifice pouting/plugging, compromised MG expressibility, and lid margin vascularity (35.0, 30.3, and 20.4%, respectively). MCJ displacement and MG expressibility had an effect on the combined CLUE score such that individual CLUE statements were analyzed (p = 0.01 and p = 0.06, respectively). MCJ displacement had an effect on comfort upon insertion (p = 0.01), comfort after 5 minutes (p = 0.03), end-of-day comfort (p = 0.01), and ability to maintain ocular moisture (p = 0.030). MG expressibility had a significant effect on general comfort (p = 0.01), comfort throughout the day (p = 0.02), and the ability to maintain ocular moisture (p = 0.02).
Conclusions:
MCJ displacement and MG expressibility have an effect on contact lens comfort.
Related Concept Videos
Microbiome of the Eye
Accessory Structures of the Eye
Muscles of the Eye
Extraocular Muscles
The six extraocular muscles surround the eyeball and control its movements. They are responsible for a wide range of eye motions, including looking up, down, left, right, and...
Glaucoma: Overview
Accessory Structures of the Skin: Sebaceous Glands
These glands that produce the oils on the skin and hair are holocrine glands. The mature...
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...

