Democracy's Denominator: Reassessing Responsiveness with Public Opinion on the National Policy Agenda
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Government policies rarely align with public opinion, especially on prominent issues. Research shows a disconnect between citizen preferences and policy outcomes, impacting democratic responsiveness.
Area Of Science
- Political Science
- Public Policy Analysis
- Survey Research
Background
- Democratic responsiveness is crucial for legitimate governance, measuring policy alignment with public preferences.
- Existing studies often use national surveys to gauge public opinion but may not align with policy agendas.
- The relationship between public opinion and policy outcomes remains a key question in political science.
Purpose Of The Study
- To empirically assess the extent of democratic responsiveness in the United States from 1947 to 2000.
- To investigate whether public opinion influences policy outcomes, particularly on salient issues.
- To examine how research methodologies affect conclusions about opinion-policy connections.
Main Methods
- Analysis of hundreds of national policy agenda issues in the U.S. (1947-2000) and their relation to public opinion data.
- A meta-analysis of existing studies on opinion-policy connections, comparing approaches starting with survey data versus policy agenda data.
- Examination of issue salience and media attention as factors influencing responsiveness.
Main Results
- Public opinion shows little to no relationship with policy outcomes across a broad range of issues.
- On highly salient issues attracting media attention, public opinion and policy outcomes are negatively related.
- Methodological choices in studies significantly alter findings on democratic responsiveness.
Conclusions
- Democratic responsiveness is weaker than often assumed, with policy outcomes frequently diverging from public preferences.
- The lack of survey data on specific policy options hinders accurate measurement of responsiveness.
- Future research requires better data integration to fully understand and track democratic responsiveness.
Related Concept Videos
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Surveys allow researchers to gather data from larger samples than may be afforded by...
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
A good example of social proof is from laugh tracks on television shows. Fullery & Skeffington (1974) found that adding group laughter sounds to material increased how humorous the participants perceived that material, regardless of whether the content itself was funny or not. By adding a laugh...

