Single-beat determination of global longitudinal speckle strain in patients with atrial fibrillation

Kazuto Yamaguchi1, Hiroyuki Yoshitomi1, Saki Ito1

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya-cyo, Izumo, 693-8501, Japan.

Insights

Assessing global longitudinal strain (GLS) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is challenging due to irregular heartbeats. A new index using the RR1/RR2 interval ratio accurately estimates GLS, improving clinical feasibility.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Echocardiography
  • Cardiac Mechanics

Background:

  • Global left ventricular (LV) systolic function is crucial for patient outcomes.
  • Assessing global longitudinal speckle strain (GLS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unreliable due to beat-to-beat variations.
  • Previous research indicates LV contractility correlates with the preceding R-R interval ratio (RR1/RR2).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical feasibility of a novel index for estimating GLS in AF patients.
  • To determine if the GLS at RR1/RR2 = 1 accurately reflects average LV contractility.

Main Methods:

  • The RR1/RR2 ratio was evaluated for GLS measurement in 20 AF patients using apical 4-chamber views.
  • GLS was recorded over ≥13 cardiac cycles, with linear regression analyzing the relationship between GLS and the RR1/RR2 ratio.
  • The GLS at RR1/RR2 = 1 was compared to the measured average GLS.

Main Results:

  • A significant correlation was observed between GLS and the RR1/RR2 ratio (r = -0.80).
  • The calculated GLS at RR1/RR2 = 1 closely matched the average GLS (-10.17 ± 2.1% vs. -10.06 ± 2.1%).
  • GLS from a single beat with equal RR1 and RR2 intervals strongly correlated with the overall average GLS (r = 0.94).

Conclusions:

  • The GLS at RR1/RR2 = 1 provides an accurate method for evaluating LV systolic parameters in AF patients.
  • This index overcomes the unreliability of averaging multiple irregular heartbeats for GLS assessment.
  • The findings support the clinical feasibility of this new index for improved AF patient management.
Abstract