Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Analysis of Group IV Viral SSHHPS Using In Vitro and In Silico Methods
Published on: December 21, 2019
Evidence that Receptor Destruction by the Sendai Virus Hemagglutinin-Neuraminidase Protein Is Responsible for
Hideo Goto1, Keisuke Ohta1, Yusuke Matsumoto1
1Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Unlabelled:
Receptor destruction has been considered one of the mechanisms of homologous Sendai virus (SeV) interference. However, direct evidence of receptor destruction upon virus infection and its relevance to interference is missing. To investigate a precise mechanism of homologous interference, we established SeV persistently infected cells. The persistently infected cells inhibited superinfection by homologous SeV but supported replication of human parainfluenza virus 2 (hPIV2) and influenza A virus (IAV). We confirmed that SeV particles could not attach to or penetrate the infected cells and that the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein of SeV was involved in the interference. Lectin blot assays showed that the α2,3-linked sialic acids were specifically reduced in the SeV-infected cells, but the level of α2,6-linked sialic acids had not changed. As infection with IAV removed both α2,3- and α2,6-linked sialic acids, especially α2,3-linked sialic acids, IAV-infected cells inhibited superinfection of SeV. These results provide concrete evidence that destruction of the specific SeV receptor, α2,3-linked sialic acids, is relevant to homologous interference by SeV.
Importance:
Viral interference is a classically observed phenomenon, but the precise mechanism is not clear. Using SeV interference, we provide concrete evidence that reduction of the α2,3-linked sialic acid receptor by the HN of SeV is closely related with viral interference. Since SeV infection resulted in decrease of only α2,3-linked sialic acids, IAV, which also utilized α2,6-linked sialic acids to initiate infection, superinfected the SeV-infected cells. In contrast, SeV could not superinfect the IAV-infected cells because both α2,3- and α2,6-linked sialic acids were removed. These results indicate that receptor destruction critically contributes to viral interference.
Related Concept Videos
Experimental RNAi
RNA Interference
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
Influenza
Leaky Scanning
siRNA - Small Interfering RNAs
In the cytoplasm, siRNA is processed from a double-stranded RNA, which comes from either endogenous DNA transcription or exogenous sources like a virus. This double-stranded RNA is then cleaved by the...
Immune Response Against Viral Pathogens
NK Cells
NK cells are a crucial part of our innate immune system, acting as the first line of defense against viral infections. These cells can recognize and kill infected cells without prior exposure to the virus, effectively slowing down the spread of infection. Additionally, NK cells produce proinflammatory...

