Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bootstrapping01:24

Bootstrapping

909
The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is...
909
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

15.6K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
15.6K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

4.4K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
4.4K
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

3.6K
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
3.6K
Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

3.8K
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
3.8K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

1.2K
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Sequential Gibbs posteriors with applications to principal component analysis.

Biometrika·2026
Same author

Scalable and robust regression models for continuous proportional data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same author

Local graph estimation with pathwise false discovery control.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Bayesian Transfer Learning.

Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics·2026
Same author

Domain Adaptive Bootstrap Aggregating.

IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same author

Logistic-Beta Processes for Dependent Random Probabilities with Beta Marginals.

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

Individualized dynamic latent factor model for multi-resolutional data with application to mobile health.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Functional principal component analysis forsparse censored data.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Finding distributions that differ, with false discovery rate control.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Comparing causal parameters with many treatments and positivity violations.

Biometrika·2026
Same journal

Leveraging External Data for Testing Experimental Therapies with Biomarker Interactions in Randomized Clinical Trials.

Biometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.3K

Data augmentation for models based on rejection sampling.

Vinayak Rao1, Lizhen Lin2, David B Dunson3

  • 1Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, U.S.A.

Biometrika
|June 10, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a data augmentation method for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inference in models using rejection sampling. This approach simplifies complex probability distributions, improving sampling algorithm performance.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferenceDensity estimationGaussian processIntractable likelihoodMarkov chain Monte CarloMatrix Langevin distributionRejection samplingTruncation

More Related Videos

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.7K
Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
09:17

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding

Published on: March 28, 2025

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.3K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.7K
Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
09:17

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding

Published on: March 28, 2025

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Computational Statistics
  • Bayesian Inference

Background:

  • Rejection sampling is common in statistical modeling but can lead to intractable posterior distributions.
  • Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are essential for Bayesian inference but face challenges with complex models.
  • Doubly-intractable problems, where likelihood evaluation is difficult, require advanced sampling techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel data augmentation scheme for MCMC inference in models with rejection sampling.
  • To simplify the joint probability distribution of observed and rejected variables.
  • To address challenges in Bayesian analysis of complex statistical models, including doubly-intractable problems.

Main Methods:

  • A data augmentation technique that instantiates rejected proposals prior to each observed data point.
  • Application of the scheme to flow-cytometry data with truncation.
  • Bayesian analysis of the matrix Langevin distribution on the Stiefel manifold.
  • Bayesian inference for a nonparametric Gaussian process density model.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method simplifies the joint probability distribution compared to the marginal distribution of observed variables.
  • Demonstrated superior performance against existing state-of-the-art sampling algorithms.
  • Successfully applied to flow-cytometry, matrix Langevin, and Gaussian process density models.

Conclusions:

  • The data augmentation scheme effectively handles rejection sampling in MCMC inference.
  • This method offers a significant improvement for doubly-intractable problems.
  • The approach provides a more tractable alternative for complex Bayesian modeling.