Cell Motility through Blebbing
Cell Migration
Cell Migration
Mechanism of Lamellipodia Formation
Introduction to Membrane Traffic
Assembly of Complex Microtubule Structures
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Engineering Three-dimensional Epithelial Tissues Embedded within Extracellular Matrix
Published on: July 10, 2016
Alvaro Román-Fernández1,2, David M Bryant1,2
1Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Switchback Road, Glasgow, G61 1BD, UK.
This review explores how cells create distinct surface regions, especially the apical side, during tissue development. It highlights the role of polarity proteins and membrane trafficking in this process. The authors focus on how endosomes and Rab GTPases help sort and deliver membrane components to the apical surface. They argue that these systems work together to establish and maintain cell identity. The findings suggest that both polarity and trafficking are essential for tissue-level polarization. The review emphasizes the need to understand how these mechanisms interact to support multicellular development.
Area of Science:
Background:
Understanding how cells establish distinct surface regions is a central challenge in developmental biology. It is already known that apical-basal polarization is a hallmark of epithelial cells in multicellular organisms. However, the intracellular mechanisms that support this polarization remain less understood. No prior work had resolved the full extent of how endosomal rearrangements contribute to surface asymmetry. This gap motivated researchers to explore the relationship between polarity proteins and membrane trafficking. Prior research has shown that polarity proteins like Par and Scribble families are essential for cell identity. Yet, the role of endosomes in this process is still under investigation. That uncertainty drove the need for a comprehensive review of how these systems interact. This paper aims to clarify the mechanisms that link cell polarity with intracellular trafficking.
Purpose Of The Study:
The goal of this review is to examine how apical membrane traffic and cell polarity proteins work together during tissue formation. The specific problem lies in understanding how these systems coordinate to establish and maintain cell surface asymmetry. The motivation comes from the need to connect intracellular trafficking with the broader context of tissue development. Researchers propose that endosome dynamics are as important as polarity proteins in this process. No prior work had fully integrated these two aspects into a unified framework. This paper seeks to bridge that gap by analyzing existing literature. The focus on apical polarization is due to its relevance in epithelial development. The authors aim to highlight how these mechanisms operate at the tissue level.
Main Methods:
This review approach synthesizes findings from multiple studies on cell polarity and membrane trafficking. The authors analyze how Par and Scribble proteins interact with endosomal pathways. They examine the role of Rab GTPases in regulating vesicle transport. The discussion includes how endosomes contribute to apical surface formation. The researchers also consider the spatial organization of intracellular compartments. They compare different models of how polarity is established in epithelial cells. The synthesis includes insights from both in vitro and in vivo studies. The authors emphasize the importance of trafficking in maintaining cell identity.
Main Results:
The key findings from the literature suggest that apical polarization depends on coordinated membrane traffic. Rab11 and Rab8 are highlighted as central to apical trafficking. The Par complex is shown to regulate endosomal positioning. Scribble proteins are linked to basolateral membrane sorting. The review proposes that endosomes serve as trafficking hubs for polarized cells. The data indicate that vesicle transport is necessary for apical surface formation. Researchers suggest that polarity proteins and trafficking pathways are interdependent. The synthesis reveals that both systems are required for tissue-level polarization.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that apical polarization is a result of the interplay between polarity proteins and membrane trafficking. They propose that endosomes are not just passive structures but active participants in polarization. The synthesis suggests that trafficking pathways are as important as polarity proteins in this process. The review highlights the need for further study on how these systems interact. The authors suggest that understanding this interplay is key to tissue development. They argue that apical polarization provides insights into broader cellular mechanisms. The findings imply that membrane traffic is essential for maintaining cell identity. The authors emphasize the importance of integrating trafficking and polarity in future research.
The main mechanism involves the interplay between cell polarity proteins and membrane trafficking pathways, particularly Rab11 and Rab8.
Endosomes act as trafficking hubs that help sort and deliver membrane components to the apical surface.
The Par complex regulates endosomal positioning, which is necessary for the correct delivery of apical membrane components.
Rab GTPases like Rab11 and Rab8 control vesicle transport to the apical surface, ensuring proper membrane trafficking.
Apical polarization is crucial for establishing distinct cell surface domains, which is essential for tissue organization.
The authors propose that polarity proteins and trafficking pathways are interdependent and work together to establish cell identity.