Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

The Muscle Cuff Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for the Amplification of Intact Peripheral Nerve Signals
Published on: January 13, 2022
Unacceptable failure of the PI2® implant
J van Aaken1, N Holzer1, L Wehrli2
11 Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie de l'appareil moteur, Hôpital Universitaire de Genève, Genève, Switzerland.
The PI2® spacer for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis has a high revision rate (27%) due to instability and dislocations. Researchers have stopped using this implant and recommend a registry for future device evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomaterials science
Background:
- Trapeziometacarpal (TM) osteoarthritis is a common condition affecting the thumb base.
- The PI2® spacer was developed as a treatment option for TM osteoarthritis.
- Concerns exist regarding the stability of the PI2® spacer due to its design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes and revision rates of the PI2® spacer in patients with TM osteoarthritis.
- To correlate implant position and scaphometacarpal distance with clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-series study of 45 PI2® spacers in 41 patients with TM osteoarthritis.
- Patients underwent trapeziectomy and PI2® spacer insertion between 2004 and 2009.
- Outcome parameters included revision rates, clinical outcomes, implant position, and scaphometacarpal distance assessed via radiographs.
Main Results:
- A total of 12 implants (27%) were removed, with common reasons including dislocations (5) and persistent pain (6).
- Of the 33 implants remaining, only 21 were available for clinical evaluation at a median follow-up of 29 months.
- No significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between in-place and subluxated implants.
Conclusions:
- The PI2® spacer demonstrated a high revision rate, consistent with existing literature.
- Due to high revision rates and instability concerns, the use of the PI2® spacer has been discontinued.
- A registry for evaluating future implants is recommended to improve patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
06:39Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
11:49Autologous Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Seeding Technology and Biocompatibility Testing For Cardiovascular Devices in Large Animal Model
Published on: September 9, 2011