Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Invasive FFR and Noninvasive CFR in the Evaluation of Ischemia: What Is the Future?
Nils P Johnson1, K Lance Gould1, Marcelo F Di Carli2
1Weatherhead PET Center For Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Insights
This review explores coronary physiology for diagnosing and managing atherosclerosis. Future diagnostic tests must improve patient outcomes, focusing on acute and stable coronary disease to refine treatments and reduce endpoints.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Physiology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Atherosclerosis diagnosis and management rely on clinical events as the gold standard.
- Coronary physiology plays a crucial role in assessing coronary artery disease.
- Current diagnostic tests, including invasive fractional flow reserve and noninvasive coronary flow reserve, are evaluated for their impact on patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an integrative and forward-looking perspective on coronary physiology.
- To examine the role of coronary physiology in the diagnosis and management of atherosclerosis.
- To identify underexplored areas in coronary physiology for future research and treatment testing.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on coronary physiology.
- Categorization of patients into acute and stable coronary disease groups.
- Analysis of the potential of coronary physiology to refine treatment strategies.
Main Results:
- Coronary physiology can potentially refine treatment for culprit lesions in acute coronary disease.
- Reducing hard endpoints with revascularization in stable and nonculprit disease may occur at the severe end of the physiological spectrum.
- Nonepicardial disease and diffuse atherosclerosis represent underexplored areas for coronary physiology testing.
Conclusions:
- The future utility of coronary physiology diagnostics hinges on their ability to improve patient outcomes.
- Further research into nonepicardial and diffuse atherosclerosis is needed.
- Coronary physiology offers potential for optimizing treatment in various coronary disease scenarios.
Abstract:
This review provides an integrative and forward-looking perspective on the gamut of coronary physiology for the diagnosis and management of atherosclerosis. Because clinical events serve as the ultimate gold standard, the future of all diagnostic tests, including invasive fractional flow reserve and noninvasive coronary flow reserve, depends on their ability to improve patient outcomes. Given the prominent role of acute coronary syndromes and invasive procedures in cardiology, we practically consider 2 broad categories of patients with coronary disease: acute and stable. For patients with acute coronary disease, coronary physiology may potentially refine treatment of the culprit lesion. For both patients with stable and acute nonculprit disease, reducing hard endpoints with revascularization potentially occurs at the severe end of the focal physiological spectrum, an area under-represented in existing trials. Nonepicardial disease and diffuse atherosclerosis remain underexplored aspects of coronary physiology for testing of novel treatments.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
06:39Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015