Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Utah anesthesia workstation.

R G Loeb1, J X Brunner, D R Westenskow

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Anesthesiology
|June 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Late Holocene "Turn-Off" of Coral Reef Growth in the Northern Red Sea and Implications for a Sea-Level Fall.

Global change biology·2025
Same author

Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: an abridged Cochrane network meta-analysis.

Anaesthesia·2020
Same author

MOSPD2 is a therapeutic target for the treatment of CNS inflammation.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2020
Same author

Meanings and feelings of (Im)mobility in later life: Case study insights from a 'New Mobilities' perspective.

Journal of aging studies·2019
Same author

Bedside tests for predicting difficult airways: an abridged Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy systematic review.

Anaesthesia·2019
Same author

Adjudication of awareness events.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same journal

Evaluation of Post-block Hypersensitivity Using Quantitative Sensory Testing Before, During, and After Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Resolution in Healthy Volunteers.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

The state of medical education research in Anesthesiology: Current landscape and future directions - An initiative of the Anesthesia Research Council.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Ultrasound-guided Focused Ultrasound-induced Noninvasive, Reversible Peripheral Nerve Blockade in an In Vivo Model of Acute Pain: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

S-Ketamine Reduces Risk of Postoperative Delirium: Comment.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

Computed Tomography-Based Body Composition Assessment for Preoperative Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

S-Ketamine Reduces Risk of Postoperative Delirium: Comment.

Anesthesiology·2026
See all related articles

A new computer-assisted anesthesia workstation prototype effectively monitors anesthesia delivery systems. This system accurately detected 88% of critical events, demonstrating its potential for enhancing patient safety in anesthesia.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Traditional anesthesia delivery systems require constant vigilance from anesthesiologists.
  • The integration of computer assistance can potentially improve monitoring accuracy and reduce human error.
  • Developing advanced systems for real-time anesthesia monitoring is crucial for patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the feasibility of a computer-assisted anesthesia workstation.
  • To develop a system that aids clinicians in controlling and monitoring anesthesia delivery.
  • To evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of a computer-based monitoring system for anesthesia machines.

Main Methods:

  • A prototype anesthesia workstation was developed using a Macintosh computer interface.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Seventeen sensors and monitors were integrated to transmit data from the anesthesia delivery system.
  • A rule-based system evaluated data per breath to detect critical events, triggering alerts.
  • Laboratory testing involved simulating 26 critical events during low flow and closed-circuit anesthesia.

    • Main Results:

    • The system correctly identified 88% (583/660) of simulated critical anesthesia events with unique messages.
    • Multiple correct messages were displayed on 35 occasions.
    • Critical events were misidentified or missed in 42 instances.
    • Eight false positive alarms occurred due to transducer baseline drift over 20 hours of testing.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed computer-assisted anesthesia workstation shows promise in enhancing anesthesia monitoring.
    • The sophisticated monitoring system reliably diagnoses specific anesthesia machine failures.
    • This technology has the potential to improve anesthesiologist situational awareness and patient safety.