Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Investigating the Three-dimensional Flow Separation Induced by a Model Vocal Fold Polyp
Published on: February 3, 2014
Analysis of free-surface flows through energy considerations: Single-phase versus two-phase modeling
Salvatore Marrone1, Andrea Colagrossi2, Andrea Di Mascio3
1CNR-INSEAN, Marine Technology Research Institute, Rome, Italy and École Centrale Nantes, LHEEA Laboratoire (ECN / CNRS), Nantes, France.
Investigating energetic free-surface flows numerically is complex. This study shows that single-phase models can predict global energy dissipation similarly to two-phase models, despite differing local flow evolutions.
Area of Science:
- Fluid dynamics
- Computational physics
- Multiphase flow
Background:
- Energetic free-surface flows involve complex air-water interfaces with fragmentation and bubble formation.
- Numerical simulations are increasingly used, often employing single-phase approximations for computational efficiency.
- The impact of air on global energy dissipation in these flows remains unclear with simplified models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the validity of single-phase approximations in predicting global mechanical energy dissipation in energetic free-surface flows.
- To compare energy evolution predictions between single-phase and two-phase numerical models.
- To understand the role of air phase energy dissipation.
Main Methods:
- Numerical simulation of a selected energetic free-surface flow problem.
- Comparison of results obtained using both single-phase and two-phase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models.
- Analysis of local flow evolution and global mechanical energy dissipation.
Main Results:
- Flow evolutions differ significantly between single-phase and two-phase models.
- Global mechanical energy dissipation evolution shows similar trends for both models.
- In the two-phase model, approximately half the energy is dissipated in the air phase, unlike the single-phase model where dissipation occurs mainly through cavity collapses.
Conclusions:
- Single-phase approximations may be sufficient for predicting global energy dissipation in certain energetic free-surface flows, despite local differences.
- The study highlights the importance of considering air phase energy dynamics.
- This finding offers potential for computational cost reduction in simulating such complex fluid phenomena.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow
Typical Model Studies
Control Volume and System Representations
The control volume approach considers a stationary region in space through which fluid flows. This region is bounded by a control surface. For instance, in the case of water...
Plane Potential Flows
Uniform...
Eulerian and Lagrangian Flow Descriptions
The Eulerian method focuses on fixed points in space where fluid properties, such as velocity, pressure, and temperature, are observed as the fluid moves between these...
Introduction to Types of Flows
Two-dimensional flow involves changes in both length and height, as seen in...

