Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale.

L B Goldstein1, C Bertels, J N Davis

  • 1Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705.

Archives of Neurology
|June 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with advanced pretreated melanoma: results of the RegoMel phase II clinical trial.

ESMO open·2026
Same author

Lassa-VSV chimeric virus targets and destroys human and mouse ovarian cancer by direct oncolytic action and by initiating an anti-tumor response.

Virology·2021
Same author

Impact of food security on glycemic control among low-income primarily Hispanic/Latino children in Los Angeles, California: A cross-sectional study.

Journal of hunger & environmental nutrition·2019
Same author

Validity and Reliability of an Expanded Vegetable Questionnaire Among Elementary School Children.

Current developments in nutrition·2019
Same author

Consumption of artificial sweetened beverages associated with adiposity and increasing HbA1c in Hispanic youth.

Clinical obesity·2018
Same author

Associations among sugar sweetened beverage intake, visceral fat, and cortisol awakening response in minority youth.

Physiology & behavior·2016

This study assessed a stroke rating scale

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Stroke rating scales are crucial for multicenter trials.
  • Assessing interobserver reliability is vital for data consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interobserver reliability of a specific rating scale used in stroke trials.
  • To determine the agreement between different raters using the scale.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty stroke patients were rated using the scale by four clinical stroke fellows.
  • Each patient was independently evaluated by pairs of observers.
  • The kappa statistic was calculated to measure interrater agreement for each scale item.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Moderate to substantial interobserver agreement was found for 9 out of 13 items on the scale.
  • The rating system demonstrated favorable comparison with other existing scales.
  • Conclusions:

    • The investigated rating scale shows promising interobserver reliability for stroke assessment.
    • Further studies are needed to establish the validity of this rating system.