Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Isolation, Culture, and Differentiation of Bone Marrow Stromal Cells and Osteoclast Progenitors from Mice
Published on: January 6, 2018
Canonical FGFs Prevent Osteogenic Lineage Commitment and Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Via
Meike Simann1, Solange Le Blanc1, Verena Schneider2
1Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Abstract:
Controlling the adipo-osteogenic lineage decision of trabecular human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs) in favor of osteogenesis represents a promising approach for osteoporosis therapy and prevention. Previously, Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 (FGF1) and its subfamily member FGF2 were scored as leading candidates to exercise control over skeletal precursor commitment and lineage decision albeit literature results are highly inconsistent. We show here that FGF1 and 2 strongly prevent the osteogenic commitment and differentiation of hBMSCs. Mineralization of extracellular matrix (ECM) and mRNA expression of osteogenic marker genes Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Collagen 1A1 (COL1A1), and Integrin-Binding Sialoprotein (IBSP) were significantly reduced. Furthermore, master regulators of osteogenic commitment like Runt-Related Transcription Factor 2 (RUNX2) and Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 (BMP4) were downregulated. When administered under adipogenic culture conditions, canonical FGFs did not support osteogenic marker expression. Moreover despite the presence of osteogenic differentiation factors, FGFs even disabled the pro-osteogenic lineage decision of pre-differentiated adipocytic cells. In contrast to FGF Receptor 2 (FGFR2), FGFR1 was stably expressed throughout osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation and FGF addition. Moreover, FGFR1 and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) were found to be responsible for underlying signal transduction using respective inhibitors. Taken together, we present new findings indicating that canonical FGFR-ERK1/2 signaling entrapped hBMSCs in a pre-committed state and arrested further maturation of committed precursors. Our results might aid in unraveling and controlling check points relevant for ageing-associated aberrant adipogenesis with consequences for the treatment of degenerative diseases such as osteoporosis and for skeletal tissue engineering strategies. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 263-275, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Insights
Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGF1 and FGF2) hinder bone formation by human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs). FGF signaling via FGFR1-ERK1/2 arrests cell maturation, impacting osteoporosis treatment and tissue engineering.
Area of Science:
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Osteoporosis therapy seeks to control human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs) lineage towards osteogenesis.
- Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGF1, FGF2) have inconsistent literature roles in skeletal precursor commitment.
- Understanding FGF signaling is crucial for bone regeneration and treating degenerative bone diseases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of FGF1 and FGF2 in the adipo-osteogenic lineage decision of hBMSCs.
- To elucidate the signaling pathways involved in FGF-mediated control of hBMSC differentiation.
- To identify potential therapeutic targets for osteoporosis and skeletal tissue engineering.
Main Methods:
- hBMSC culture and induction of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation.
- Analysis of osteogenic marker gene expression (ALP, COL1A1, IBSP) and matrix mineralization.
- Assessment of key transcription factors (RUNX2, BMP4) and receptor expression (FGFR1, FGFR2).
- Pharmacological inhibition of FGFR1 and ERK1/2 signaling pathways.
Main Results:
- FGF1 and FGF2 significantly inhibited hBMSC osteogenic commitment and differentiation.
- Reduced matrix mineralization and downregulation of osteogenic markers and master regulators (RUNX2, BMP4) were observed.
- Canonical FGF signaling, specifically via FGFR1-ERK1/2, was identified as the mechanism arresting hBMSC maturation.
- FGFs prevented osteogenic differentiation even in the presence of differentiation factors.
Conclusions:
- FGF1 and FGF2 actively suppress osteogenesis in hBMSCs, contrary to previous assumptions.
- The FGFR1-ERK1/2 pathway is a critical checkpoint that entraps hBMSCs in a pre-committed state.
- These findings offer new insights into age-related adipogenesis and provide targets for osteoporosis treatment and skeletal tissue engineering.
More Related Videos
08:01Stimulation of Notch Signaling in Mouse Osteoclast Precursors
Published on: February 28, 2017
10:32Author Spotlight: Simple Establishment of a Vascularized Osteogenic Bone Marrow Niche Using Pre-Cast Poly(Ethylene Glycol) (PEG) Hydrogels in an Imaging Microplate
Published on: May 19, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Lineage Commitment
Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells