Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
The Impact of Model-Misspecification on Model Based Personalised Dosing
David A J McDougall1,2, Jennifer Martin3, E Geoffrey Playford4,5
1School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. david.mcdougall1@uqconnect.edu.au.
Model Based Personalised Dosing (MBPD) relies on accurate pharmacokinetic models. Omitting non-linear clearance in models significantly impacts dosing accuracy, while removing patient covariates has minimal effect on clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacometrics
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Antifungal Drug Development
Background:
- Model Based Personalised Dosing (MBPD) utilizes population pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacodynamic models for optimal drug dosing.
- The selection of a specific PK model can significantly influence the clinical utility of MBPD.
- Voriconazole, a widely used antifungal, has multiple published population PK models, presenting a challenge for MBPD implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of model misspecification on the clinical utility of MBPD.
- To assess how structural model simplifications affect voriconazole dosing recommendations.
- To determine the influence of covariate removal (body weight, CYP2C9 genotype) on MBPD outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Development of five structurally mis-specified population PK models for voriconazole.
- Simulation of plasma concentrations for 100 virtual subjects under each model.
- Determination of dose adjustments using empirical Bayes estimates to achieve target exposure.
- Prediction of plasma concentrations and clinical outcomes based on recommended doses.
Main Results:
- Models lacking non-linear clearance showed poor performance, recommending 155-310 mg higher doses with one plasma concentration.
- Removal of body weight as a covariate had no clinically significant impact on outcomes.
- Exclusion of CYP2C9 genotype, a known influential covariate, also did not significantly affect clinical outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Structural model misspecification, particularly the omission of non-linear clearance, substantially degrades the clinical utility of MBPD for voriconazole.
- Exclusion of key patient covariates like body weight and CYP2C9 genotype from PK models has a negligible impact on the clinical effectiveness of MBPD.
- Accurate structural model components are crucial for reliable MBPD, outweighing the influence of certain covariates.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Model Components
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...

