Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

9.9K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
9.9K
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

161.0K
Overview
161.0K
Protein and Protein Structure02:15

Protein and Protein Structure

91.6K
Proteins are one of the most abundant organic molecules in living systems and have the most diverse range of functions of all macromolecules. Proteins may be structural, regulatory, contractile, or protective. They may serve in transport, storage, or membranes; or they may be toxins or enzymes. Their structures, like their functions, vary greatly. They are all, however, amino acid polymers arranged in a linear sequence.
A protein's shape is critical to its function. For example, an enzyme...
91.6K
Protein and Protein Structures02:15

Protein and Protein Structures

20.0K
20.0K
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER01:29

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER

5.4K
ER is the primary site for the maturation and folding of soluble and transmembrane secretory proteins. The calnexin cycle is a specific chaperone system that folds and assesses the confirmation of N-glycosylated proteins before they can exit the ER lumen. The primary players of this quality check pipeline are the lectins, ER-resident chaperones, and a glucosyl transferase enzyme. In case the calnexin system in the lumen fails to salvage a misfolded protein, it is transported to the cytoplasm...
5.4K
Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

130.0K
Overview
130.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SHREC 2025: Protein surface shape retrieval including electrostatic potential.

Computers & graphics·2026
Same author

DAQplugin: Deep Learning based Real-time Model Evaluation Plugin for ChimeraX.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Direct Detection and Atomic Modeling of Ligands in Cryo-EM Maps Using Deep Learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

PL-PatchSurfer3: improved structure-based virtual screening for structure variation using 3D Zernike descriptors.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same author

Multivalent recognition of ferritin by full-length NCOA4 enables robust ferritinophagy.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.0K

Ensemble-based evaluation for protein structure models.

Michal Jamroz1, Andrzej Kolinski1, Daisuke Kihara2

  • 1Department of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02-093, Poland.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|June 17, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

FlexScore evaluates protein structures by accounting for residue flexibility, offering a more accurate assessment of computational models than rigid methods. This approach aligns with expert evaluations and provides practical insights into model quality.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.0K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

Area of Science:

  • Structural biology
  • Protein bioinformatics
  • Computational biophysics

Background:

  • Evaluating computational protein structure models is crucial.
  • Current methods often treat proteins rigidly, ignoring inherent flexibility.
  • Residue flexibility varies, necessitating nuanced comparison approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce FlexScore, a novel method for protein structure comparison.
  • Incorporate residue-specific flexibility into structure evaluation.
  • Improve the assessment of computational protein models.

Main Methods:

  • FlexScore utilizes an ensemble of protein conformations, modeled as a multivariate Gaussian distribution of atomic displacements.
  • Flexibility information is derived from experimental data (e.g., NMR) or simulations (e.g., molecular dynamics).
  • Compares a query computational model against the native protein's conformational ensemble.

Main Results:

  • FlexScore demonstrates strong agreement with expert assessments of computational models.
  • The method provides practical insights into the usefulness of protein structure models.
  • Comparative analysis shows FlexScore's advantages over traditional structure similarity scores.

Conclusions:

  • FlexScore offers a more biologically relevant approach to protein structure comparison.
  • Accounting for flexibility enhances the evaluation of computational models.
  • This method has practical applications in structural biology and bioinformatics.