Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structural variation in d(CTCTAGAG). Implications for protein-DNA interactions.

W N Hunter1, B L D'Estaintot, O Kennard

  • 1University Chemical Laboratory, Cambridge, U.K.

Biochemistry
|March 21, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mutations in POGLUT1 in Galli-Galli/Dowling-Degos disease.

The British journal of dermatology·2016
Same author

The state-of-the art in macromolecular crystallization: the IYCr series concludes.

Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications·2016
Same author

The power of three.

Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications·2015
Same author

Macromolecular crystallography and what it can contribute to antiparasite drug discovery.

Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications·2015
Same author

The times they are a-changin' - news from Acta Crystallographica Section F.

Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications·2014
Same author

Crystallographic examination of hydrated oxytetracycline hydrochloride and hydrobromide.

Antibiotics & chemotherapy (Northfield, Ill.)·2014
Same journal

Aromatic Cage-Directed Azide-Methyllysine Photochemistry for Profiling Nonhistone Interacting Partners of the MeCP2 Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Differential Hydroxypyruvate Processing by <i>E. coli</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> DXP Synthases Reveals Preferential Xylulose 5-Phosphate Formation by the <i>P. aeruginosa</i> Enzyme.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Structural and Functional Characterization of Heterologous Nitrogenase Complexes.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Discovery of Bacterial Unspecific Peroxygenases.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Lactate Biology: Subcellular Routing and Chemical Form Define Function.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Nature's Anaerobic Toolkit: Glycyl Radical Enzymes and Their Expanding Functional and Mechanistic Diversity.

Biochemistry·2026
See all related articles

This study used X-ray diffraction to reveal the A-DNA family structure of the d(CTCTAGAG) DNA oligomer. Unusual features at the central TpA step suggest roles in protein-DNA interactions.

Area of Science:

  • Structural Biology
  • Crystallography
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • DNA structure dictates function and interactions.
  • Understanding specific DNA sequences is crucial for molecular biology.
  • The d(CTCTAGAG) oligomer is a self-complementary DNA sequence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the three-dimensional structure of the d(CTCTAGAG) DNA oligomer.
  • To analyze the structural features and potential implications for protein binding.

Main Methods:

  • Single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
  • Structure refinement to 2.15-A resolution.
  • Analysis of crystallographic data (space group, unit cell dimensions).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Determined the tetragonal unit cell (P4(3)2(1)2) with specific dimensions.
  • Revealed a right-handed duplex with A-DNA family characteristics (e.g., C3'-endo, shallow minor groove).
  • Identified unusual interstrand purine-purine overlap and backbone conformation at the central TpA step.

Conclusions:

  • The d(CTCTAGAG) octamer adopts an A-DNA-like conformation.
  • Specific structural anomalies, particularly at the TpA step, may mediate sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions.
  • These findings offer insights into DNA-protein recognition mechanisms involving nucleases and repressors.