Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A review guide for computer assisted testing software.

S R Johnston

    Computers in Nursing
    |May 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This article presents a tool for evaluating educational testing software. It provides guidelines for critiquing programs used in test creation, administration, and performance analysis.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Relationship between IHC4 score and response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

    Breast cancer research and treatment·2017
    Same author

    Residual proliferative cancer burden to predict long-term outcome following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2014
    Same author

    The breast cancer genome and the complexity of different subgroups: what does it all mean?

    The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh·2013
    Same author

    EGFR/HER2 inhibitor AEE788 increases ER-mediated transcription in HER2/ER-positive breast cancer cells but functions synergistically with endocrine therapy.

    British journal of cancer·2010
    Same author

    THE ROENTGENOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE GASTRIC MUCOUS MEMBRANE.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
    Same author

    Consensus statement. Workshop on therapeutic resistance in breast cancer: impact of growth factor signalling pathways and implications for future treatment.

    Endocrine-related cancer·2005
    Same journal

    Medi-Sim Multimedia: AACN Critical Care-Hematological System.

    Computers in nursing·2002
    Same journal

    Managing Information in Healthcare: Concepts and Cases.

    Computers in nursing·2002
    Same journal

    Using online learning in a traditional face-to-face environment.

    Computers in nursing·2002
    Same journal

    The "big bang" implementation: not for the faint of heart.

    Computers in nursing·2002
    Same journal

    Homebound older adults' experiences with the Internet and e-mail.

    Computers in nursing·2002
    Same journal

    A study of factors related to the use of online resources by nurse educators.

    Computers in nursing·2002
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Measurement and Evaluation
    • Computer Science in Education

    Background:

    • Computer software is increasingly used in educational testing for various functions.
    • Existing review forms lack criteria specific to educational testing software.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe a tool for critiquing educational testing software.
    • To provide guidelines for evaluating software used in test bank creation, test development, test administration, and performance analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a critique tool for educational testing software.
    • Identification of unique features of computer applications in educational testing.

    Main Results:

    • The tool offers guidelines for critiquing educational testing software.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • It incorporates principles of measurement and evaluation relevant to educational testing.
  • Unique criteria for reviewing educational software are identified.

    • Conclusions:

    • The developed tool aids in the critical evaluation of educational testing software.
    • It addresses a gap in existing review methodologies by including measurement and evaluation principles.