Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

08:15
Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
Published on: February 17, 2023
1.5K
[The Italian ArthroPlasty Registry: a model to export?]
Marina Torre1, Emilio Romanini2
1Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Centro Nazionale di Epidemiologia, Sorveglianza e Promozione della Salute, Roma - Gruppo di Lavoro Ortopedia Basata su prove di Efficacia (GLOBE), Roma.
Recenti Progressi in Medicina
|June 17, 2016
Summary
Medical device registries are vital for tracking implant performance and patient safety. The Italian Arthroplasty Registry (RIAP) demonstrates a model for collecting crucial data to improve joint replacement surgery outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Medical device regulation and post-market surveillance.
- Health informatics and data management.
- Orthopedic surgery outcomes research.
Background:
- Medical device (MD) registries are essential for evaluating outcomes, market surveillance, and patient traceability during recalls.
- European regulations emphasize the need for comparable data collection in device registers.
- Over 170,000 joint replacements were performed in Italy in 2013, highlighting the importance of registry data for surgical approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the critical role of medical device registries in assessing implant performance and informing clinical practice.
- To present the Italian Arthroplasty Registry (RIAP) as a model for establishing comprehensive device data collection.
- To discuss the integration of Hospital Discharge Records and additional data for implant identification.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing Hospital Discharge Records integrated with supplementary data for detailed procedure and implant information.
- Developing and maintaining the RIAP MD Library, containing approximately 55,000 records updated by 60 manufacturers.
- Leveraging existing data infrastructure to create a scalable registry model.
Main Results:
- The RIAP project, initiated in 2006, successfully collects and manages data on arthroplasty procedures.
- The RIAP MD Library facilitates device identification in the absence of a universal Unique Device Identifier.
- The established model is adaptable for other implanted devices with defined minimum datasets.
Conclusions:
- Medical device registries are crucial for evidence-based clinical practice and improved patient outcomes in joint replacement surgery.
- The RIAP project provides a functional model for device data collection that can be extended to various implanted devices.
- Standardized data collection through registries supports regulatory compliance and enhances post-market surveillance.
