Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

Exploring the methods of data analysis in multifocal visual evoked potentials.

L Malmqvist¹, L De Santiago², C Fraser³

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Nordre Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark. Lasse.malmqvist.larsen.01@regionh.dk.

Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology

|June 18, 2016

Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The age and sex dynamics of heterosexual HIV transmission in Zambia: an HPTN 071 (PopART) phylogenetic and modelling study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

PHOMS: An apt and accurate acronym.

Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia·2024

Same author

Seasonal controls on stream metal(loid) signatures in mountainous discontinuous permafrost.

The Science of the total environment·2023

Same author

An acute case of Pimelea elongata toxicity in cattle in western New South Wales.

Australian veterinary journal·2022

Same author

Statistical and agent-based modelling of the transmissibility of different SARS-CoV-2 variants in England and impact of different interventions.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022

Same author

Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis using multifocal ERG data feature fusion.

An international journal on information fusion·2021

Same journal

Bilateral perifoveal macular ischemia in non-proliferative Duchenne muscular dystrophy-associated retinopathy: a case report.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

Association between dynamic pupil parameters and corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

Structure-function relationship between handheld photopic negative response and macular GCIPL thickness in chronic optic neuropathy.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

Clinical course of a patient with PRSS56-associated nanophthalmos (isolated microphthalmia) and uveal effusion syndrome.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

Congenital grouped albinotic spots of the retinal pigment epithelium-a case report.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

Screening for RPE65 genetic variants in Egyptian children with inherited retinal disorders: a study from a tertiary eye care center in Egypt.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026

See all related articles

This summary is machine-generated.

This study reduced variability in multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) tests by comparing analysis methods. The logSNR and peak-to-peak techniques offer the most reliable results for clinical applications.

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Neuroscience
Biomedical Engineering

Background:

The multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is a key tool for assessing visual function topographically.
Existing mfVEP measurement variability limits its use in conditions like glaucoma and multiple sclerosis.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare various mfVEP data analysis methods.
To identify techniques that minimize measurement variability for improved clinical utility.

Main Methods:

Twenty-three healthy subjects underwent mfVEP testing.
Amplitude variability was assessed using peak-to-peak, RMS, SNR, and logSNR methods.
Latency variability was analyzed via second peak and cross-correlation techniques.

Main Results:

Keywords:

Coefficient of variability Data analysis Inter-subject variability Intra-subject variability Multifocal visual evoked potentials

More Related Videos

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

LogSNR and peak-to-peak methods showed significantly lower intra-subject amplitude variability than RMS and SNR.
LogSNR demonstrated the lowest inter-subject amplitude variability.
Cross-correlation analysis for latency yielded significantly lower intra- and inter-subject variability compared to the second peak method.

Conclusions:

LogSNR or SNR methods are recommended for comparing amplitude data between patient groups due to lower inter-subject variability.
LogSNR or peak-to-peak methods are suitable for comparing individual mfVEP data to normative data, offering lower intra-subject variability.
The selection of an appropriate mfVEP data analysis method is crucial for reducing result variability and enhancing diagnostic accuracy.