Comparison of six commercial kits to extract bacterial chromosome and plasmid DNA for MiSeq sequencing

Laura Becker1, Matthias Steglich2, Stephan Fuchs1

  • 1Robert Koch Institute, FG13 Division of Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistances, Department of Infectious Diseases, Wernigerode, Germany.

Scientific Reports
|June 18, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Choosing a DNA extraction kit for Klebsiella pneumoniae impacts small plasmid recovery. Precipitation-based methods may deplete plasmids under 5 kb, affecting copy-number estimates compared to real-time PCR.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Accurate genomic DNA extraction is crucial for bacterial sequencing.
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important Gram-negative bacterium with diverse genetic elements, including plasmids.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare commercial DNA extraction kits for Klebsiella pneumoniae.
  • To evaluate the impact of different DNA purification methods on subsequent Miseq sequencing quality and coverage.

Main Methods:

  • Commercial DNA extraction kits utilizing matrix binding (silica, anion exchange resin) and differential precipitation (salting out) were tested.
  • Extracted genomic DNA was subjected to Miseq sequencing.
  • Quantitative real-time PCR was used for comparison of plasmid copy-number estimates.

Main Results:

  • Kit choice had minimal impact on sequencing quality and coverage for large replicons.
  • Precipitation-based extraction methods showed apparent depletion of small plasmids (<5 kb).
  • Sequencing coverage provided higher copy-number estimates for small plasmids than quantitative real-time PCR.

Conclusions:

  • DNA extraction method choice can influence the representation of small plasmids in sequencing data.
  • Matrix-binding methods may be preferable for comprehensive recovery of all plasmid sizes.
  • Miseq sequencing coverage offers a valuable tool for estimating plasmid copy numbers.