Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

29.6K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
29.6K
Knee Joint01:23

Knee Joint

3.6K
The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
3.6K
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

12.4K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
12.4K
Kinetic Energy for a Rigid Body01:13

Kinetic Energy for a Rigid Body

590
Imagine a solid object involved in a general planar movement, with its center of mass pinpointed at a spot labeled G. The object's kinetic energy relative to an arbitrary point A can be quantified for each of its particles - the ith particle in this case. This measurement is achieved through the employment of the relative velocity definition. The position vector, known as rA, extends from point A to the mass element i.
590
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

15.7K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
15.7K
Kinematic Equations - I01:26

Kinematic Equations - I

17.2K
When an object moves with constant acceleration, the velocity of the object changes at a constant rate throughout the motion. The kinematic equations of motions are derived for such cases where the acceleration of the object is constant. The first kinematic equation gives an insight into the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and time. We can see, for example:
17.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adequate canal-filling ratio and extension stem length reduce radiographic loosening in revision total knee arthroplasty using hybrid fixation with grit-blasted, fluted stems.

The Knee·2026
Same author

Markerless motion capture methodologies in biomechanics: From 2D images to 3D joint angles, a narrative review.

Gait & posture·2026
Same author

Inverse optimal control of muscle force sharing during pathological gait.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same author

Midterm Results of Large-Caliber Tendon Allografting for Chronic Achilles Tendon Rupture With Large Defects.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Impact of age and slope angle on the motion between the body's center of mass and center of pressure during downhill walking.

Gait & posture·2026
Same author

Predicting the distance between the center of mass and center of pressure during walking in the young and elder population based on ground reaction forces using artificial neural network.

Gait & posture·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.4K

Knee Kinematics Estimation Using Multi-Body Optimisation Embedding a Knee Joint Stiffness Matrix: A Feasibility

Vincent Richard1,2, Giuliano Lamberto3, Tung-Wu Lu4,5

  • 1Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, UMR_T9406, LBMC, F69622, Lyon, France.

Plos One
|June 18, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an elastic knee joint model for multi-body optimization (MBO), improving joint kinematics estimation. The novel elastic model offers comparable accuracy to spherical joints while outperforming unconstrained and parallel mechanism models.

More Related Videos

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.8K
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.4K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.8K
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Motion Analysis
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Multi-body optimization (MBO) is used for joint kinematics estimation from stereophotogrammetric data.
  • Current MBO joint models, like mechanical linkages, oversimplify joint function, limiting detailed analysis.
  • Compensating for soft tissue artifact in motion analysis remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a novel elastic knee joint model for MBO.
  • To compare the performance of the elastic joint model against traditional constraints in estimating knee kinematics.
  • To assess the accuracy and feasibility of using an elastic joint model in MBO for motion analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an elastic knee joint model representing femur and tibia as rigid bodies connected by an element with a single stiffness matrix.
  • Implemented the elastic joint as a "soft" constraint within MBO using a penalty-based method.
  • Compared kinematic estimates from MBO with elastic, no, spherical, and parallel mechanism joint models against bi-planar fluoroscopy reference data in two subjects ascending stairs.

Main Results:

  • The elastic joint model in MBO yielded low average bias and standard deviation for knee kinematics (0.9±3.2° for angles, 1.6±2.3 mm for displacements).
  • These results were superior to unconstrained and parallel mechanism models and comparable to the spherical joint model.
  • Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the elastic joint model to variations in stiffness matrix parameters.

Conclusions:

  • The elastic knee joint model is a feasible and effective alternative to traditional constraints in MBO.
  • This approach enhances the accuracy of joint kinematics estimation, particularly in the presence of soft tissue artifacts.
  • The elastic joint model provides a more nuanced representation of joint behavior compared to simplified mechanical linkages.