Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The incomplete, multiple ascertainment model: assumptions, applications, and alternative models.

J Stene1

  • 1Institute of Statistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Genetic Epidemiology
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that simplified incomplete, multiple ascertainment models produce inaccurate genetic segregation probability estimates. Ignoring independently ascertained individuals and common ascertainment biases significantly distorts results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fatal hyperammonemia after renal transplant due to late-onset urea cycle deficiency: a case report.

Transplantation proceedings·2010
Same author

Experiences with risk estimates for carriers of chromosomal reciprocal translocations.

Clinical genetics·1992
Same author

Comments on estimations of risks to translocation carriers.

American journal of medical genetics·1989
Same author

Controversy concerning paternal age effect in 47,+21 Down's syndrome.

Human genetics·1989
Same author

A reanalysis of the New York State prenatal diagnosis data on Down's syndrome and paternal age effects.

Human genetics·1987
Same author

On methodological issues regarding 47,+21 paternal age data.

Human genetics·1987

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • The incomplete, multiple ascertainment model is frequently used in genetic studies.
  • This model is crucial for estimating disease transmission patterns within families.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the assumptions and applications of the incomplete, multiple ascertainment model.
  • To identify potential biases arising from common simplifications and ascertainment strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the mathematical properties of the incomplete, multiple ascertainment model.
  • Evaluation of the impact of data reduction techniques (suppressing independent probands).
  • Assessment of bias introduced by ascertainment through the first affected individual.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Using a reduced model that ignores independently ascertained probands leads to inaccurate and unstable parameter estimates.
  • Segregation probability estimates are seriously biased when samples are primarily ascertained through the first affected family member, a common scenario not accounted for by the standard model.

Conclusions:

  • The standard incomplete, multiple ascertainment model requires careful application.
  • Researchers should avoid simplifying the model by omitting independent proband data.
  • Specific ascertainment methods, like proband-first ascertainment, necessitate specialized analytical approaches to avoid biased genetic parameter estimation.